Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Spell Versatility is GONE. Rejoice!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 8130526" data-attributes="member: 6801228"><p>The ability not to be mind controlled and taken out of the fight when the other caster might have been is also important. But we never talk about the classes that get wisdom saves until someone brings it up as a counter to the discussion always focusing on Sorcerer Con saves. </p><p></p><p>How many times has someone said that you should play a Wizard, Cleric or Druid because they have good Wisdom saves? </p><p></p><p>Compare that to how many times people say that one of the most powerful features of the Sorcerer is their Constitution saves, something completely passive, that they can't choose to utilize, and in the best situations, they never use in the first place.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And how many times do you need to be invisible for more than an hour, and you know that when you cast the spell? What good is casting it in combat and hiding? Especially on a class that likely does not have the greatest stealth. </p><p></p><p>And you know, I think you might be able to give me a specific example that fits both of those. "Well what about when...", but think about this... how often do those things happen? Does it happen so often that the wizard needs a second hour of invisibility (and not three, four or more) that is becomes a common problem with the spell? </p><p></p><p>Not in my experience. In my experience, that is a niche problem. So, you have niche answers to niche problems. And that is your defining design choice, having niche answers to niche problems... which would make your design supposed to be the most versatile. </p><p></p><p>Except the sorcerer can't be versatile, if they are the one who has the answer to the niche problem, then they are stepping on the wizard's toes. </p><p></p><p></p><p>And this is the constant refrain I see in these debates.</p><p></p><p>"But you can twin Polymorph and get two Giant Apes, wizards can only get one"</p><p></p><p>"But you can twin Haste and get two allies hasted, wizards can only get one."</p><p></p><p>"But you can careful spell hypnotic pattern and set it on top of your allies without hurthing them, and wizards have to place it in a way that doesn't include their allies" </p><p></p><p></p><p>And when you go to look at the Wizard discussions, what do you see?</p><p></p><p>"With polymorph you can turn an injured fighter into a giant ape. Best healing spell in the game and you can devastate encounters"</p><p></p><p>"Put haste on the Fighter or Barbarian, and watch them go to town. It is a great way to devastate encounters."</p><p></p><p>"Hypnotic Pattern can control an entire enemy. Instant win if they all fail their saves, and still turns the tide completely in your favor."</p><p></p><p></p><p>So, no one is saying that they need these spells to be doubled or to be cast more recklessly. These are top tier spells already that alter the flow of combat. I can attest as a Warlock who has used Haste and Hypnotic Pattern extensively. I've never once felt like I wished I was a sorcerer so I could use metamagic on those spells. And we had a bard using Polymorph constantly, and again, no one was watching that going "man, if only we had a sorcerer to make this better" we were going "Oh yeah, we are going to win this fight now. This changes everything."</p><p></p><p>So, the sorcerer gets a passive benefit that people only talk about because they get little else worth talking about, and the ability to maybe try and eke out niche benefits or get diminishing returns on the great spells other classes are using.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chaosmancer, post: 8130526, member: 6801228"] The ability not to be mind controlled and taken out of the fight when the other caster might have been is also important. But we never talk about the classes that get wisdom saves until someone brings it up as a counter to the discussion always focusing on Sorcerer Con saves. How many times has someone said that you should play a Wizard, Cleric or Druid because they have good Wisdom saves? Compare that to how many times people say that one of the most powerful features of the Sorcerer is their Constitution saves, something completely passive, that they can't choose to utilize, and in the best situations, they never use in the first place. And how many times do you need to be invisible for more than an hour, and you know that when you cast the spell? What good is casting it in combat and hiding? Especially on a class that likely does not have the greatest stealth. And you know, I think you might be able to give me a specific example that fits both of those. "Well what about when...", but think about this... how often do those things happen? Does it happen so often that the wizard needs a second hour of invisibility (and not three, four or more) that is becomes a common problem with the spell? Not in my experience. In my experience, that is a niche problem. So, you have niche answers to niche problems. And that is your defining design choice, having niche answers to niche problems... which would make your design supposed to be the most versatile. Except the sorcerer can't be versatile, if they are the one who has the answer to the niche problem, then they are stepping on the wizard's toes. And this is the constant refrain I see in these debates. "But you can twin Polymorph and get two Giant Apes, wizards can only get one" "But you can twin Haste and get two allies hasted, wizards can only get one." "But you can careful spell hypnotic pattern and set it on top of your allies without hurthing them, and wizards have to place it in a way that doesn't include their allies" And when you go to look at the Wizard discussions, what do you see? "With polymorph you can turn an injured fighter into a giant ape. Best healing spell in the game and you can devastate encounters" "Put haste on the Fighter or Barbarian, and watch them go to town. It is a great way to devastate encounters." "Hypnotic Pattern can control an entire enemy. Instant win if they all fail their saves, and still turns the tide completely in your favor." So, no one is saying that they need these spells to be doubled or to be cast more recklessly. These are top tier spells already that alter the flow of combat. I can attest as a Warlock who has used Haste and Hypnotic Pattern extensively. I've never once felt like I wished I was a sorcerer so I could use metamagic on those spells. And we had a bard using Polymorph constantly, and again, no one was watching that going "man, if only we had a sorcerer to make this better" we were going "Oh yeah, we are going to win this fight now. This changes everything." So, the sorcerer gets a passive benefit that people only talk about because they get little else worth talking about, and the ability to maybe try and eke out niche benefits or get diminishing returns on the great spells other classes are using. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Spell Versatility is GONE. Rejoice!
Top