Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Crimson Longinus" data-source="post: 8306009" data-attributes="member: 7025508">They're fighter, they don't suck if they have to just attack on some rounds. Even casters tend to use their cantrips on many rounds, at least if the GM tries to at least somewhat pay attention to keeping the encounter/rest ratio sensible.And yah, battlemaster is no warlord, but I could see somewhat similarly built subclass being a decent warlord. It would require having an option of 'sharing' some of the fighter's extra attacks, action surges and maybe even the second wind with the allies. And then have manoeuvres that focus on support and boosting allies. But then again, I didn't like 4e warlord, and I played a long time in a party with one. I certainly wouldn't try to directly emulate 4e warlord, and full 'lazy warlord' is not something I want to ever see in D&D again.</blockquote>