Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Spellcasters and Balance in 5e: A Poll
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ECMO3" data-source="post: 8309804" data-attributes="member: 7030563"><p>Like I said it is far less complicated to lift it off his belt than to do multiple thing in the description. The intent is to allow him to use it for the same things a Rogue could use SOH for if he was standing next to him.</p><p></p><p>Could an invisible Rogue standing next to the wizard try to lift the pouch if you were DM? Then why can't the hand?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Most DMs would allow him to try to take the pouch, but if they didn't componets would usually be treated like a single object for this purpose, just like ball bearings or caltrops. Reach in grab the components and go.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well considering the hand can only move 10 pounds, if it is noticed the wizard can stop it. I think that is the idea. Just like if a thief tries to use a slight of hand to life a purse (as described in the PHB). If the thief fails and he is noticed he does not get the purse right? If the hand fails and is noticed it does not get the pouch.</p><p></p><p>Regardless if he passes the check he will absolutely not notice it floating in the air because that is what the rules say - he will not notice and that is the whole idea of the mechanic. Why would noticing the pouch floating be any different from noticing anything else that was stolen from him floating in the air? He will notice when he reaches for it next turn of course. As DM explain this anyway you want , "the hand deflty shifts to avoid the wizards eyes as it loops around behind his back with the pouch", "or you whistle to get his attention as the hand slinks away the other direction" or if you are not that creative - "its magic"</p><p></p><p>If you do not allow this you are nerfing the intention of this ability. Why would it be in there if they did not intend fpor players to use it?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ECMO3, post: 8309804, member: 7030563"] Like I said it is far less complicated to lift it off his belt than to do multiple thing in the description. The intent is to allow him to use it for the same things a Rogue could use SOH for if he was standing next to him. Could an invisible Rogue standing next to the wizard try to lift the pouch if you were DM? Then why can't the hand? Most DMs would allow him to try to take the pouch, but if they didn't componets would usually be treated like a single object for this purpose, just like ball bearings or caltrops. Reach in grab the components and go. Well considering the hand can only move 10 pounds, if it is noticed the wizard can stop it. I think that is the idea. Just like if a thief tries to use a slight of hand to life a purse (as described in the PHB). If the thief fails and he is noticed he does not get the purse right? If the hand fails and is noticed it does not get the pouch. Regardless if he passes the check he will absolutely not notice it floating in the air because that is what the rules say - he will not notice and that is the whole idea of the mechanic. Why would noticing the pouch floating be any different from noticing anything else that was stolen from him floating in the air? He will notice when he reaches for it next turn of course. As DM explain this anyway you want , "the hand deflty shifts to avoid the wizards eyes as it loops around behind his back with the pouch", "or you whistle to get his attention as the hand slinks away the other direction" or if you are not that creative - "its magic" If you do not allow this you are nerfing the intention of this ability. Why would it be in there if they did not intend fpor players to use it? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Spellcasters and Balance in 5e: A Poll
Top