Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Spellcasters and Balance in 5e: A Poll
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ECMO3" data-source="post: 8315348" data-attributes="member: 7030563"><p>I have never had it significantly hurt my fighters.</p><p></p><p>I know all the build guides for virtually every class list this as important and almost universally a second or third stat but I have found that intelligent play in combat usually overcomes the need for high constitution. And out of combat it is nearly useless, unlike every other skill.</p><p></p><p>To be honest, I think intimidation, stealth and perception are more important in combat than constitution and boosting abilities that improve those three skills will go a long way to covering the gap in hps. Wisdom in particular is going to help in terms of hp conservation by avoiding surprise and the advantage and free turn that comes with it.</p><p></p><p>The exception to this IMO is the Barbarian. They do actually need a high constitution because it is really hard for them to avoid hits.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It depends on exactly the Rogue build you are comparing him to. The Rogue as a chassis has more skills and is more versatile. The fighter as a chassis has more combat capability across a wide area.</p><p></p><p>Those differences do come into play and into the build. But a combat focused Rogue will not be very far ahead of a skill-focused fighter. Most of the stuff a Rogue has the fighter can get through feats. Sure a Rogue can get those same feats and stay well ahead, but he is well behind in terms of combat then.</p><p></p><p></p><p>The fighter can be anyone you want him to be. To be honest it is rarely a good idea to invest in both dex and strength. If you were really optimizing damage using both bows and heavy melee weapons both and to the hells with everything else you might do that or if you wanted to be good in melee and at stealth, but that is a very high price to pay. Usually one of these two can be an 8 easy while compromising little in combat. In terms of all around play, a S or D fighter with an 8 in one of them is a lot easier to play than a fighter with a Wisdom or Charisma of 8.</p><p></p><p>I discussed constitution above and consider it a completely overated ability. Others at my table invest in it and they go down more than I do.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This was true in earlier versions but in 5E any class can serve any function (tank, striker, leader, utility, support) with the right class and background choices.</p><p></p><p></p><p>No it is not and I have played fighters that do not do either of these things.</p><p></p><p>I find this idea is generally held by players that lack imagination and see classes in terms of outdated tropes.</p><p></p><p></p><p>It is a tradeoff but it is not a severe loss when you can just dump constitution. It does make you use those skills to be effective in combat though.</p><p></p><p>If you need your fighter to be dominant in combat, yes you can't do that. But that is only 1 way to play a fighter.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ECMO3, post: 8315348, member: 7030563"] I have never had it significantly hurt my fighters. I know all the build guides for virtually every class list this as important and almost universally a second or third stat but I have found that intelligent play in combat usually overcomes the need for high constitution. And out of combat it is nearly useless, unlike every other skill. To be honest, I think intimidation, stealth and perception are more important in combat than constitution and boosting abilities that improve those three skills will go a long way to covering the gap in hps. Wisdom in particular is going to help in terms of hp conservation by avoiding surprise and the advantage and free turn that comes with it. The exception to this IMO is the Barbarian. They do actually need a high constitution because it is really hard for them to avoid hits. It depends on exactly the Rogue build you are comparing him to. The Rogue as a chassis has more skills and is more versatile. The fighter as a chassis has more combat capability across a wide area. Those differences do come into play and into the build. But a combat focused Rogue will not be very far ahead of a skill-focused fighter. Most of the stuff a Rogue has the fighter can get through feats. Sure a Rogue can get those same feats and stay well ahead, but he is well behind in terms of combat then. The fighter can be anyone you want him to be. To be honest it is rarely a good idea to invest in both dex and strength. If you were really optimizing damage using both bows and heavy melee weapons both and to the hells with everything else you might do that or if you wanted to be good in melee and at stealth, but that is a very high price to pay. Usually one of these two can be an 8 easy while compromising little in combat. In terms of all around play, a S or D fighter with an 8 in one of them is a lot easier to play than a fighter with a Wisdom or Charisma of 8. I discussed constitution above and consider it a completely overated ability. Others at my table invest in it and they go down more than I do. This was true in earlier versions but in 5E any class can serve any function (tank, striker, leader, utility, support) with the right class and background choices. No it is not and I have played fighters that do not do either of these things. I find this idea is generally held by players that lack imagination and see classes in terms of outdated tropes. It is a tradeoff but it is not a severe loss when you can just dump constitution. It does make you use those skills to be effective in combat though. If you need your fighter to be dominant in combat, yes you can't do that. But that is only 1 way to play a fighter. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Spellcasters and Balance in 5e: A Poll
Top