Spycraft tops the charts!

[JoeGKushner]

Actually, I hate to say this, but I'm going to be amending my score and review when I get a moment. I gave it 5/5, but after playing it for some time both I and my players agreed that it doesn't work qute as well as it reads. So I'll be dropping mine to a 4/5.

I actually plan on dropping a few scores; many things seem cool but when put through their paces just aren't as good as you'd expect.

I had this problem with WoTC Diablo 2 book. I loved the Necromancer and other classes and their abilities but there needed to be some serious errata for that book and the lack of response from WoTC killed it. Hell, not even an issue of Sage Advice.

 

[trancejeremy]

Uh oh. I predict a stink that will make the Winter Olympics gold medal debacle look like a scoring dispute at the Little Miss Doodle Soup beauty pageant.

The Russians got to him. Or Tonya Harding .


Seriously, that happens a lot. At first, it seems really great (or bad), but after playing it a while you become more and more aware of problems (or find that possible problems aren't really so bad).

 

[Furn_Darkside]

Allowing for revisions of scores seems like a good idea to me. It works both ways too. My initial reaction to Arms and Armor was rather poor but as time went on I kept using material from it so that it might now be one of my most-used non-WotC d20 products.

Salutations,

As long as the text is revised to explain why, otherwise I think it would be better to just allow people to delete their own reviews and post a new one for that item.

FD

 

[Desdichado]

I'm curious to see how Spycraft stacks up agains d20 Modern, myself. Sounds like they're doing essentially the same thing, despite d20 Modern's claim to be more universal.