Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Squared FireBalls?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Haffrung Helleyes" data-source="post: 4047144" data-attributes="member: 1068"><p>Here's why:</p><p></p><p>It isn't ideal that we model Dragons and Beholders and people as squares. But we do so for several reasons:</p><p></p><p>1) in the case of medium sized creatures, they fit inside a 5' square, and the 5' square is the minimum level of granularity on the battlemap.</p><p></p><p>2) in the case of larger creatures, we model them as squares because to do otherwise would unavoidably add the issue of facing to combat, and facing rules aren't in the game. </p><p></p><p>3) Another reason we model larger creatures as squares is because there are a great many monsters in D&D , and they come in a large number of shapes and sizes. It would be difficult to come up with a small number of models that every creature could be mapped to.</p><p></p><p>Nevertheless, the fact that large creatures are modeled as squares in D&D isn't a strength of the system. It's an area where I have to apply house rules from time to time as a concession to common sense. For example, the Huge Constrictor Snake shouldn't have to squeeze to go down a corridor.</p><p></p><p>In the case of the fireball, it is a regular , symmetrical solid. No issues of facing are introduced by modeling it as a sphere, and the different types of spheres that the system needs to represent are few. So it's much easier to treat the fireball in a more realistic matter than the dragon.</p><p></p><p>When designing an RPG, you have to balance the realism of the system with speed of play. What we are saying is that you are sacrificing a large amount of realism (more with the movement rules than with the square fireballs, in my opinion) for a marginal gain in speed of play. </p><p></p><p>Even if the gain in speed of play is significant, there's a point past which the realism sacrifice makes suspension of disbelief for some of us impossible. At that point it just doesn't matter if the game plays faster. </p><p></p><p>It seems to me that WoTC is introducing a lot of these changes for the sake of consistency with the miniatures game. If I am correct, you must admit, it's a poor tradeoff for those of us who don't play D&D minis.</p><p></p><p>Ken</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Haffrung Helleyes, post: 4047144, member: 1068"] Here's why: It isn't ideal that we model Dragons and Beholders and people as squares. But we do so for several reasons: 1) in the case of medium sized creatures, they fit inside a 5' square, and the 5' square is the minimum level of granularity on the battlemap. 2) in the case of larger creatures, we model them as squares because to do otherwise would unavoidably add the issue of facing to combat, and facing rules aren't in the game. 3) Another reason we model larger creatures as squares is because there are a great many monsters in D&D , and they come in a large number of shapes and sizes. It would be difficult to come up with a small number of models that every creature could be mapped to. Nevertheless, the fact that large creatures are modeled as squares in D&D isn't a strength of the system. It's an area where I have to apply house rules from time to time as a concession to common sense. For example, the Huge Constrictor Snake shouldn't have to squeeze to go down a corridor. In the case of the fireball, it is a regular , symmetrical solid. No issues of facing are introduced by modeling it as a sphere, and the different types of spheres that the system needs to represent are few. So it's much easier to treat the fireball in a more realistic matter than the dragon. When designing an RPG, you have to balance the realism of the system with speed of play. What we are saying is that you are sacrificing a large amount of realism (more with the movement rules than with the square fireballs, in my opinion) for a marginal gain in speed of play. Even if the gain in speed of play is significant, there's a point past which the realism sacrifice makes suspension of disbelief for some of us impossible. At that point it just doesn't matter if the game plays faster. It seems to me that WoTC is introducing a lot of these changes for the sake of consistency with the miniatures game. If I am correct, you must admit, it's a poor tradeoff for those of us who don't play D&D minis. Ken [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Squared FireBalls?
Top