barsoomcore
Unattainable Ideal
http://barsoom.hyboria.net/monsters-plus-stat-blocks.zip
Knock yourself out. Should be accurate, but you never know...
Knock yourself out. Should be accurate, but you never know...
barsoomcore said:http://barsoom.hyboria.net/monsters-plus-stat-blocks.zip
Knock yourself out. Should be accurate, but you never know...
Atk +43) or electricity ray +35 ranged touch (2d6+12/19-20 (plus 1d6 on critical, spinning blade);
Anaxim; CR 22; Medium construct (extraplanar, lawful); HD 38d10; hp 420; Init +7 (Dex); Spd 60 ft., fly 200 ft. (perfect); AC 37 (+7 dex, +20 natural); Base Atk +28; Grp +40; Atk +43 melee (2d6+12/19-20 [plus 1d6 on critical], spinning blade) or +35 ranged touch (electricity ray); Full Atk +43 melee (2d6+12/19-20 [plus 1d6 on critical], 2 spinning blades) and +35 melee (2d6+6, 2 slams) and +35 melee (2d6+6, shocking touch) or +35 ranged touch (10d6 electricity, electricity ray) and +30 ranged (2d6+12, 120 ft. range increment, 6 spikes); Space/Reach 5 ft./5 ft.; SA Rend 4d6+18, sonic blast, spell-like abilities, summon iron golem; SQ Abomination traits, magic immunity, construct traits, fast healing 15, spell resistance 34, damage reduction 10/chaotic and epic and adamantine; AL LN; SV Fort +12, Ref +19, Will +17; Str 35, Dex 25, Con -, Int 10, Wis 20, Cha 20
Skills and Feats: Climb +53, Jump +65; Blind-Fight, Cleave, Devastating Critical (blade), Epic Toughness, Epic Weapon Focus (blade), Great Cleave, Improved Bull Rush, Improved Critical (blade), Improved Initiative, Improved Sunder, Overwhelming Critical (blade), Power Attack, Weapon Focus (blade)
Great wyrm prismatic dragon; CR 66; Colossal+ dragon (light); HD 78d12+2,106; hp 2,613; Init +4; Spd 60 ft., fly 350 ft. (clumsy); AC 106 (-8 size, +27 deflection, +77 natural), touch 29, flat-footed 106; Base Atk +78; Grp +125; Atk +102 melee (8d6+31/19-20, bite); Full Atk +102 melee (8d6+31/19-20, bite) and +102 melee (4d8+15/19-20, 2 claws) and +101 melee (4d6+15/19-20, 2 wings) and +102 melee (4d8+46, tail slap); Space/Reach 30 ft./20 ft. (30 ft. with bite); SA Breath weapon (80 ft. prismatic spray effect, DC 76), crush 8d6+46 (DC 76), frightful presence (DC 76), tail sweep 4d6+46 (DC 76); SQ Blindsense 60 ft., damage reduction 25/epic, darkvision 120 ft., immunity to sleep and paralysis, keen senses, prismatic sphere, prismatic wall, rainbow pattern, spell resistance 86, spells (caster level 38th), sunbeam, sunburst; AL N; SV Fort +68, Ref +41, Will +68; Str 73, Dex 10, Con 65, Int 64, Wis 65, Cha 64
Skills and Feats: Appraise +68, Bluff +68, Concentration +108, Craft (alchemy) +68, Diplomacy +108, Disable Device +68, Escape Artist +81, Gather Information +68, Heal +68, Hide +25, Intimidate +108, Jump +72, Knowledge (all) +108, Listen +110, Move Silently +41, Open Lock +41, Search +108, Sense Motive +108, Spellcraft +68, Spot +110, Survival +68, Tumble +41, Use Magic Device +108 (149 skill points remaining); Alertness, Blind-Fight, Cleave, Combat Reflexes, Empower Spell, Flyby Attack, Great Cleave, Hover, Improved Critical (bite), Improved Critical (claws), Improved Critical (wings), Improved Initiative, Improved Spell Capacity (x4), Improved Sunder, Maximize Spell, Power Attack, Snatch, Spell Knowledge (x3), Weapon Focus (bite), Weapon Focus (claw), Weapon Focus (tail slap), Wingover
Vascant said:Let me say, "Full Attack" in the stat block was interesting to code.
I know I used your spell data to pull from and combined with 2 other tables to create the master table I use for spells in my NPC Gen. I checked out the rest of the data and though it might be useful for a kind of "Help Desk" feature, nothing else is usable.
andargor said:I know the data is not "program friendly" yet, since it's not broken down. But as I've already mentionned I will do that eventually and this is just a first step so that at least it's more easily parsable. Some people have started using it for "shake and bake" web-based reference tools, and it's probably what it's good for at this point.
Andargor
I say no. The information's in the XML already, no?andargor said:Should I include SA/SQ descriptions at the end as well?