Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ozziewolf" data-source="post: 4287012" data-attributes="member: 64443">I'm surprised Xorn didn't catch that as we had this debate just the other day.Technically it's 2d10 +1d6 from hunter's quarry.However!The odds of having both attacks land is something like 30%.&nbsp; I'm not a number cruncher but I'm sure Xorn could hammer out the exact numbers.Rogue would be 3d6+Dex let's assume 4 dex as typical.Ranger average damage assuming both attacks land: 14.5 damage. (14-15 damage range.)Rogue average ranged damage assuming one attack lands: 14.5 damage. (14-15 damage range.)So the odds of the ranger getting this insane damage making two attack rolls is considerably less than the Rogue with Combat advantage making one attack.&nbsp; Something in the neighborhood of one out of every three standard actions landing both attacks.Edit: So with that in mind average damage over 3 rounds using twin strike for a Ranger: 32.5 damageAverage damage for a rogue over 3 rounds: 43.5 damage.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="ozziewolf, post: 4287012, member: 64443"] I'm surprised Xorn didn't catch that as we had this debate just the other day. Technically it's 2d10 +1d6 from hunter's quarry. However! The odds of having both attacks land is something like 30%. I'm not a number cruncher but I'm sure Xorn could hammer out the exact numbers. Rogue would be 3d6+Dex let's assume 4 dex as typical. Ranger average damage assuming both attacks land: 14.5 damage. (14-15 damage range.) Rogue average ranged damage assuming one attack lands: 14.5 damage. (14-15 damage range.) So the odds of the ranger getting this insane damage making two attack rolls is considerably less than the Rogue with Combat advantage making one attack. Something in the neighborhood of one out of every three standard actions landing both attacks. Edit: So with that in mind average damage over 3 rounds using twin strike for a Ranger: 32.5 damage Average damage for a rogue over 3 rounds: 43.5 damage. [/QUOTE]

Verification