Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Stealth in Combat
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DM_Blake" data-source="post: 4352859" data-attributes="member: 57267"><p>Sure, you could do that.</p><p> </p><p>Me, I do it another way.</p><p> </p><p>First, since a room full of kobolds would all have pretty much the samme passive perception value (since they are all similar kobolds), taking 10 (using passive perception) pretty much means every kolbold sees him (bad rogue stealth roll) or no kobold sees him (average or good rogue stealth roll). There is very little possibility that a few kobolds happen to be looking the right way at the right time and spot him (which is what a good perception roll would represent if I did take the time to roll each one).</p><p> </p><p>Of course, the target of the attack needs an immediate perception check to know if combat advantage is granted. But the other 39 kobolds don't need any check at all. I see no benefit, now, on the rogue's turn, to knowing which of the kobolds can see him and which cannot. </p><p> </p><p>Most actions the rogue might do will break his stealth anyway. So, one kobold needs to see him (or fail to see him), the rogue takes his action and consequently becomes unstealthed.</p><p> </p><p>One stealth roll, one perception roll. Done.</p><p> </p><p>But, assuming the rogue's action doesn't blow his stealth, I have him write his stealth roll on the battlemat near his figure.</p><p> </p><p>On my turn, when I'm moving all those kobolds, I will look at the tactical situation.</p><p> </p><p>Some kobolds will naturally go after the wizard, or the fighter, or whoever, because that's the PC threatening them. Essentially, I decide it like the rogue has no cover/concealment/stealth at all - which kobolds would attack the rogue if they knew he was there, and which kobolds would not attack him even if they can plainly see him. </p><p> </p><p>I move all the kobolds who wouldn't attack the rogue without rolling their perception checks. Who cares if they see him or not since they aren't going to attack him either way?</p><p> </p><p>For the remaining kobolds who would attack the rogue, I roll their perceptions before they act. One perception roll, then move the kobold accordingly (attack the rogue if he saw him, or go look for the rogue if he didn't, or ignore the rogue and attack someone else in some cases. Next kobold. One perception roll, then move the kobold accordingly. Etc.</p><p> </p><p>This works easiest for me. No blanket "everyone fails" or "everyone succeeds" based on passive perception. No rolling for 40 kobolds. No remembering perception rolls made 5 minutes ago during the rogue's turn when it's finally my turn to move the kobolds.</p><p> </p><p>Piece of cake.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DM_Blake, post: 4352859, member: 57267"] Sure, you could do that. Me, I do it another way. First, since a room full of kobolds would all have pretty much the samme passive perception value (since they are all similar kobolds), taking 10 (using passive perception) pretty much means every kolbold sees him (bad rogue stealth roll) or no kobold sees him (average or good rogue stealth roll). There is very little possibility that a few kobolds happen to be looking the right way at the right time and spot him (which is what a good perception roll would represent if I did take the time to roll each one). Of course, the target of the attack needs an immediate perception check to know if combat advantage is granted. But the other 39 kobolds don't need any check at all. I see no benefit, now, on the rogue's turn, to knowing which of the kobolds can see him and which cannot. Most actions the rogue might do will break his stealth anyway. So, one kobold needs to see him (or fail to see him), the rogue takes his action and consequently becomes unstealthed. One stealth roll, one perception roll. Done. But, assuming the rogue's action doesn't blow his stealth, I have him write his stealth roll on the battlemat near his figure. On my turn, when I'm moving all those kobolds, I will look at the tactical situation. Some kobolds will naturally go after the wizard, or the fighter, or whoever, because that's the PC threatening them. Essentially, I decide it like the rogue has no cover/concealment/stealth at all - which kobolds would attack the rogue if they knew he was there, and which kobolds would not attack him even if they can plainly see him. I move all the kobolds who wouldn't attack the rogue without rolling their perception checks. Who cares if they see him or not since they aren't going to attack him either way? For the remaining kobolds who would attack the rogue, I roll their perceptions before they act. One perception roll, then move the kobold accordingly (attack the rogue if he saw him, or go look for the rogue if he didn't, or ignore the rogue and attack someone else in some cases. Next kobold. One perception roll, then move the kobold accordingly. Etc. This works easiest for me. No blanket "everyone fails" or "everyone succeeds" based on passive perception. No rolling for 40 kobolds. No remembering perception rolls made 5 minutes ago during the rogue's turn when it's finally my turn to move the kobolds. Piece of cake. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Stealth in Combat
Top