Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Stealth in Combat
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Xorn" data-source="post: 4354823" data-attributes="member: 61231"><p>Beautiful Roxlimn!</p><p></p><p>I was taking a particularly good crap last night, and I got to page 279-280 of the PHB and saw Combat Advantage. I'm looking at it and I read the list of reasons you can have Combat Advantage, again.</p><p></p><p>Unable to see the attacker (page 281) -- Okay, that's rules for cover/concealment, and total cover/concealment says specifically the target can't see you. The only mention of stealth is if someone wants to attack what they can't see.</p><p></p><p>Unaware of you (page 188) -- Well that's the stealth rules. Wait, there's not one mention of stealth granting combat advantage because the target can't see you. Only because they are unaware of you!</p><p></p><p>By that reading--Stealth keeps someone unaware of you, while Total Concealment/Superior Cover keeps someone from being able to see you. Either state grants combat advantage... but neither section tells me that stealth can make someone unaware of me after they are aware.</p><p></p><p>So after reading this during my late night crap (and again comparing my reading from every tactics section of every creature in every module/book), this only served to reinforce my decision to be in camp #2. Heck, even the stealth rules only mention gaining combat advantage for the target being <em>unaware</em>. It's really ironic that after I read this, someone posts exactly what I saw right before me. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>As far as the rules as written not supporting camp #2, yes they do--if I read them my way. I could <em>choose</em> to interpret them your way, and be in camp #1, but the whole point is neither of us can say we're right, period. I can say I'm right <em>if</em> I interpret what is printed my way.</p><p></p><p>And rogues should have combat advantage most of the time--it's pretty easy to achieve. You've got two rounds that you should have a free combat advantage. The first round (target unaware), and a Bluff round. Not to mention if you have a half-decent initiative, you can get a third round free with surprise. If you haven't gotten a flank set up within three rounds, you should probably look into playing an archer ranger.</p><p></p><p>Between a warlord and a fighter, our rogue has combat advantage on multiple targets pretty much at will.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Xorn, post: 4354823, member: 61231"] Beautiful Roxlimn! I was taking a particularly good crap last night, and I got to page 279-280 of the PHB and saw Combat Advantage. I'm looking at it and I read the list of reasons you can have Combat Advantage, again. Unable to see the attacker (page 281) -- Okay, that's rules for cover/concealment, and total cover/concealment says specifically the target can't see you. The only mention of stealth is if someone wants to attack what they can't see. Unaware of you (page 188) -- Well that's the stealth rules. Wait, there's not one mention of stealth granting combat advantage because the target can't see you. Only because they are unaware of you! By that reading--Stealth keeps someone unaware of you, while Total Concealment/Superior Cover keeps someone from being able to see you. Either state grants combat advantage... but neither section tells me that stealth can make someone unaware of me after they are aware. So after reading this during my late night crap (and again comparing my reading from every tactics section of every creature in every module/book), this only served to reinforce my decision to be in camp #2. Heck, even the stealth rules only mention gaining combat advantage for the target being [i]unaware[/i]. It's really ironic that after I read this, someone posts exactly what I saw right before me. :) As far as the rules as written not supporting camp #2, yes they do--if I read them my way. I could [i]choose[/i] to interpret them your way, and be in camp #1, but the whole point is neither of us can say we're right, period. I can say I'm right [i]if[/i] I interpret what is printed my way. And rogues should have combat advantage most of the time--it's pretty easy to achieve. You've got two rounds that you should have a free combat advantage. The first round (target unaware), and a Bluff round. Not to mention if you have a half-decent initiative, you can get a third round free with surprise. If you haven't gotten a flank set up within three rounds, you should probably look into playing an archer ranger. Between a warlord and a fighter, our rogue has combat advantage on multiple targets pretty much at will. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Stealth in Combat
Top