Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Stealth in Combat
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Xorn" data-source="post: 4357016" data-attributes="member: 61231"><p>I don't know if you were busy being offended that I didn't say, "Oh my god, you're right!" but what I specifically said that I would not say you're wrong, because I can't. Why don't I point out that no one has addressed anything about the advised tactics for creatures using stealth YET.</p><p></p><p>How is me bolding "AVOID notice, unheard and unseen" and different than you bolding "avoid notice UNHEARD and UNSEEN"? I read that if you don't AVOID notice, you are not unheard and unseen. I don't read REMOVE notice anywhere. There difference between us is I'm NOT trying to tell you that you're way is wrong. If I wanted to use you're ruling, I could present plenty of arguments to support it--but I can't clearly refute that the way I suggest is wrong.</p><p></p><p>You seem to think you can, but restating evidence towards your idea over and over and over and over and over. I <em>can't</em> disprove your side, and I'm not trying to. I <em>can</em> make points that support both sides, and I think I can make <em>more points</em> to <em>myself</em> that support my side more than yours. But I still don't think either of us is wrong.</p><p></p><p>Why does Combat Advantage only direct you to Stealth under "Unaware of you (page 188)" and only direct you to Concealment for "Unable to see the attacker (page 281)"? That is all I need to read to be done with why I'm going with my way.</p><p></p><p>I can further feel good about myself as a person for choosing my way after seeing that the <em>cause</em> of being unheard and unseen is not being noticed--which in my gut says I'm reading the whole sentence, not getting tunnel vision on what's listed after the cause.</p><p></p><p>CAUSE (You avoid notice,) --> EFFECT (unheard and hidden from view.)</p><p></p><p>Page 188 states clearing that I get Combat Advantage from stealth when the target isn't aware of me. (I <em>interpret</em> that to mean the reason they printed that blurb about Combat Advantage there is because that is how they intended for Stealth to grant combat advantage.)</p><p></p><p>But one more time--I can <em>understand</em> and I can't <em>disprove</em> the logic that you're using. (Nor do I desire to.)</p><p></p><p>That's how I reached my decision about Stealth, combined with the opinions of my table, on how it should work. I promise you that you can suggest I'm refusing to disprove your logic all you like (and you're correct, though I stated I couldn't more times than I should need to), but you are as important as fly<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> on my window compared to the players at my table.</p><p></p><p>So the way I want to run things is carved in stone and carried down from the mountain weeks ago--unless I get an email from Mearls today, quoting this post right here, that says, "Sorry J, but camp #1 is correct, and we accidentally messed up the tactics for every encounter we've published."</p><p></p><p>The CSRs can say whatever they like (which is obvious with the glaring contradictions they have with themselves), and they are just giving us their interpretations of the rules, too.</p><p></p><p>The moment I read that Combat Advantage indicates you only look at Stealth rules when determining if the target is aware of you, I'm done. If I decided that it did apply, then I would start leaning towards Combat Advantage with just Cover/Concealment = Yes, but I didn't cross that first hurdle.</p><p></p><p>I feel better about my choice (on a personal level, not because it proves you wrong) because after reading Kobold Hall, Keep on the Shadowfell, Heathen, and Sleeping in the Tomb of Dreams now, they seem to support my ideas of Stealth & Combat Advantage and how they work.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Xorn, post: 4357016, member: 61231"] I don't know if you were busy being offended that I didn't say, "Oh my god, you're right!" but what I specifically said that I would not say you're wrong, because I can't. Why don't I point out that no one has addressed anything about the advised tactics for creatures using stealth YET. How is me bolding "AVOID notice, unheard and unseen" and different than you bolding "avoid notice UNHEARD and UNSEEN"? I read that if you don't AVOID notice, you are not unheard and unseen. I don't read REMOVE notice anywhere. There difference between us is I'm NOT trying to tell you that you're way is wrong. If I wanted to use you're ruling, I could present plenty of arguments to support it--but I can't clearly refute that the way I suggest is wrong. You seem to think you can, but restating evidence towards your idea over and over and over and over and over. I [i]can't[/i] disprove your side, and I'm not trying to. I [i]can[/i] make points that support both sides, and I think I can make [i]more points[/i] to [i]myself[/i] that support my side more than yours. But I still don't think either of us is wrong. Why does Combat Advantage only direct you to Stealth under "Unaware of you (page 188)" and only direct you to Concealment for "Unable to see the attacker (page 281)"? That is all I need to read to be done with why I'm going with my way. I can further feel good about myself as a person for choosing my way after seeing that the [i]cause[/i] of being unheard and unseen is not being noticed--which in my gut says I'm reading the whole sentence, not getting tunnel vision on what's listed after the cause. CAUSE (You avoid notice,) --> EFFECT (unheard and hidden from view.) Page 188 states clearing that I get Combat Advantage from stealth when the target isn't aware of me. (I [i]interpret[/i] that to mean the reason they printed that blurb about Combat Advantage there is because that is how they intended for Stealth to grant combat advantage.) But one more time--I can [i]understand[/i] and I can't [i]disprove[/i] the logic that you're using. (Nor do I desire to.) That's how I reached my decision about Stealth, combined with the opinions of my table, on how it should work. I promise you that you can suggest I'm refusing to disprove your logic all you like (and you're correct, though I stated I couldn't more times than I should need to), but you are as important as fly:):):):) on my window compared to the players at my table. So the way I want to run things is carved in stone and carried down from the mountain weeks ago--unless I get an email from Mearls today, quoting this post right here, that says, "Sorry J, but camp #1 is correct, and we accidentally messed up the tactics for every encounter we've published." The CSRs can say whatever they like (which is obvious with the glaring contradictions they have with themselves), and they are just giving us their interpretations of the rules, too. The moment I read that Combat Advantage indicates you only look at Stealth rules when determining if the target is aware of you, I'm done. If I decided that it did apply, then I would start leaning towards Combat Advantage with just Cover/Concealment = Yes, but I didn't cross that first hurdle. I feel better about my choice (on a personal level, not because it proves you wrong) because after reading Kobold Hall, Keep on the Shadowfell, Heathen, and Sleeping in the Tomb of Dreams now, they seem to support my ideas of Stealth & Combat Advantage and how they work. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Stealth in Combat
Top