Pbartender
First Post
Re: Re: [Strange and on topic] Haste . . . and the physics of food?
Besides, there is a vast difference between increasing the velocity of an object as a whole, and increasing the individual speeds of its contituent atoms/molecules to increase its temperature.
buzzard said:
No. It wouldn't provide enough energy.
Time for back of envelope calculations:
100 Kg fighter increased in speed from 30 KPH to 60 KpH
Increase from 8 mps to 16 mps. (E= 1/2 mv^2)
12800 joules - 3200 joules= 9600 joules.
This amounts to 2291 calories.
Now this may sound lik a lot. However each calorie will raise one gram of water one degree celsius. Say a decent portion of stew is 250 g (1/2 pount for us merkins). we need to raise it from room temperature to a good eating temperature. So we go from 21 C to 48 C. This process will take 6750 calories.
Cooking is even more energy intensive in general. This was just re-heating. Thus, a basic calculation shows that haste is a no-show energy wise.
buzzard
Besides, there is a vast difference between increasing the velocity of an object as a whole, and increasing the individual speeds of its contituent atoms/molecules to increase its temperature.