Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Strange New Worlds season 2 - SPOILERS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ruin Explorer" data-source="post: 9053971" data-attributes="member: 18"><p>That's all true, but it in no way excuses any of this, because none of it was necessary.</p><p></p><p>Do you get what I'm saying? You can write a legal drama episode without resorting to the levels of brain-damaging legal stupidity that they did here. There's no reason to make it this dumb unless the writer is literally so ignorant of the law and courts that they think it's not dumb. They could easily have written the asylum law, for example, so that it DID apply, rather than writing a completely irrelevant law.</p><p></p><p>It's one of the worst traits of a lot of '90s and '00s sci-fi shows, including the very worst seasons of Star Trek, to take a subject that doesn't need to be examined in detail, and go into it in detail, but make that detail completely and utterly moronic.</p><p></p><p>You see it occasionally in SF novels too - one good example being a lovely novel where the author totally unnecessarily stops the plot for like two pages of exposition on how the power supply of the main android character works, explaining that it's totally not a perpetual motion machine, except she has 100% perfectly described a perpetual motion machine, because she went into too much detail on the science, and revealed she didn't understand physics well enough. The rest of the novel is fine, but that bit is the equivalent of saying how good you are at math and then handing the audience a math exam where you've scored an E, and got most of the answers wrong.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ruin Explorer, post: 9053971, member: 18"] That's all true, but it in no way excuses any of this, because none of it was necessary. Do you get what I'm saying? You can write a legal drama episode without resorting to the levels of brain-damaging legal stupidity that they did here. There's no reason to make it this dumb unless the writer is literally so ignorant of the law and courts that they think it's not dumb. They could easily have written the asylum law, for example, so that it DID apply, rather than writing a completely irrelevant law. It's one of the worst traits of a lot of '90s and '00s sci-fi shows, including the very worst seasons of Star Trek, to take a subject that doesn't need to be examined in detail, and go into it in detail, but make that detail completely and utterly moronic. You see it occasionally in SF novels too - one good example being a lovely novel where the author totally unnecessarily stops the plot for like two pages of exposition on how the power supply of the main android character works, explaining that it's totally not a perpetual motion machine, except she has 100% perfectly described a perpetual motion machine, because she went into too much detail on the science, and revealed she didn't understand physics well enough. The rest of the novel is fine, but that bit is the equivalent of saying how good you are at math and then handing the audience a math exam where you've scored an E, and got most of the answers wrong. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Strange New Worlds season 2 - SPOILERS
Top