Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Styles of D&D Play
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="EzekielRaiden" data-source="post: 9240815" data-attributes="member: 6790260"><p>I don't really see the difference between #1 and #2. Cumbersome and complex is how I would describe a game where it is sufficiently unclear that you don't actually know how to use it.</p><p></p><p>And I would argue #3 is still a problem for 5e on both of its prongs. Niche skills include Investigation (which is poorly-understood, difficult to use, and rarely necessary), Animal Handling (often redundant with Nature, and rarely useful overall), Survival (most of its listed tasks can also be done with some other skill, mostly Perception or Nature), and Performance (almost completely useless). Athletics and Sleight of Hand are both in danger of falling into that category as well, only saved by having very basic utility value. Super skills include Perception, Persuasion, Stealth, Deception, and to a lesser extent due to being context-specific, Nature, Medicine, and Insight.</p><p></p><p>4e actually took steps (in an exception-based way) to address the gaps between the various abilities. 5e threw that out the window, and the rather weak effort to make all six stats into saves did not even remotely address the gap. Dexterity is still the top stat, followed by Wis and Con, unless you're a Charisma caster, then Cha probably fits between Dex and Wis/Con.</p><p></p><p>So, I guess then what I'm saying is...it seems like, if 5e is so good at that "give me a Wisdom roll" process, despite being plagued by some of the very problems you mentioned here, I'm not really sure how any game that isn't really, <em>really</em> badly designed would not also do this.</p><p></p><p>E.g. I've played SR5e and W20, and both of those games have nigh-identical, very straightforward mechanics for such rolls. In W20, you add your Attribute (ability score, a number of dots usually from 1-5) to a relevant Ability (which includes both "skills" and other stuff, again usually dots but 0-5), and then roll that many d10s, target number is usually 6-7. Add up stuff at or above TN, subtract off the 1s. If it's positive, you succeeded. Easy-peasy. Shadowrun works very similarly, making a dice pool from your attributes + relevant skill, but uses d6, TN is 5 or 6, and 1s don't <em>subtract</em> success, they just make complications if there are lots of them (<em>nasty</em> complications if you also fail the roll.)</p><p></p><p>Obviously, dice-pool systems differ from single-die systems, but overall the effect seems the same. Tally up your bonus, roll the dice, check if you succeeded, move on with your day. If the system is even merely competently designed, I don't see how the original statement doesn't apply.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="EzekielRaiden, post: 9240815, member: 6790260"] I don't really see the difference between #1 and #2. Cumbersome and complex is how I would describe a game where it is sufficiently unclear that you don't actually know how to use it. And I would argue #3 is still a problem for 5e on both of its prongs. Niche skills include Investigation (which is poorly-understood, difficult to use, and rarely necessary), Animal Handling (often redundant with Nature, and rarely useful overall), Survival (most of its listed tasks can also be done with some other skill, mostly Perception or Nature), and Performance (almost completely useless). Athletics and Sleight of Hand are both in danger of falling into that category as well, only saved by having very basic utility value. Super skills include Perception, Persuasion, Stealth, Deception, and to a lesser extent due to being context-specific, Nature, Medicine, and Insight. 4e actually took steps (in an exception-based way) to address the gaps between the various abilities. 5e threw that out the window, and the rather weak effort to make all six stats into saves did not even remotely address the gap. Dexterity is still the top stat, followed by Wis and Con, unless you're a Charisma caster, then Cha probably fits between Dex and Wis/Con. So, I guess then what I'm saying is...it seems like, if 5e is so good at that "give me a Wisdom roll" process, despite being plagued by some of the very problems you mentioned here, I'm not really sure how any game that isn't really, [I]really[/I] badly designed would not also do this. E.g. I've played SR5e and W20, and both of those games have nigh-identical, very straightforward mechanics for such rolls. In W20, you add your Attribute (ability score, a number of dots usually from 1-5) to a relevant Ability (which includes both "skills" and other stuff, again usually dots but 0-5), and then roll that many d10s, target number is usually 6-7. Add up stuff at or above TN, subtract off the 1s. If it's positive, you succeeded. Easy-peasy. Shadowrun works very similarly, making a dice pool from your attributes + relevant skill, but uses d6, TN is 5 or 6, and 1s don't [I]subtract[/I] success, they just make complications if there are lots of them ([I]nasty[/I] complications if you also fail the roll.) Obviously, dice-pool systems differ from single-die systems, but overall the effect seems the same. Tally up your bonus, roll the dice, check if you succeeded, move on with your day. If the system is even merely competently designed, I don't see how the original statement doesn't apply. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Styles of D&D Play
Top