Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Styles of D&D Play
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Crimson Longinus" data-source="post: 9245164" data-attributes="member: 7025508"><p>So do people who want to gameify social situations feel that the rules on DMG pages 244 and 245 are not sufficient?</p><p></p><p>I think 5e already occupies a middle position in this. it has social skills and ways to use them, it just expects you to actually engage with the NPCs and have some actual arguments. I think focusing even more on the rules would harm the roleplay.</p><p></p><p>I played quite a bit Exalted. In the second edition it had extensive social combat mechanics. They were quite involved. They also allowed the demigod characters of the game to convince people of things that it was sometimes really hard to conceptualise as any way possible in the real life. But the player had spent their points on these skills and powers, so it would have been unfair to deny them.</p><p></p><p>With super socially focused characters we just kinda gave up on the roleplay.</p><p></p><p>Player: "I convince him on the thing."</p><p>Me: "How?"</p><p>Player: "I have no idea. I can't imagine how anyone could ever convince a person this way. But the rules say that I easily can."</p><p>Me: "Fair enough, roll your bucket of dice."</p><p></p><p>And even worse. The rules would allow the NPCs do the same to the PC. I never used social skills and powers on PCs that way, as to me it would just feel wrong to rob the player agency that way, but by RAW that's how it should have worked.</p><p></p><p>I don't want this. I don't want any of this. I want to have real conversations where people play their characters and make real arguments in-character. We might roll the dice at the end, but it is mostly just real conversation, and the DC of the check will be based on how likely I feel the NPC is to be convinced by the PCs argument, so what you say matters. </p><p></p><p>And I think a lot of people who are new to D&D want this too. Critical Role has been one of the biggest influences to people to get to into the game. It is all about people immersing in their characters and talking in-character. It is wise for D&D to focus their support on this type of play. And you don't need to be a professional actor to do this. But presumably anyone who is playing this game in the first place can speak, so they can say what their character says or at least paraphrase it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Crimson Longinus, post: 9245164, member: 7025508"] So do people who want to gameify social situations feel that the rules on DMG pages 244 and 245 are not sufficient? I think 5e already occupies a middle position in this. it has social skills and ways to use them, it just expects you to actually engage with the NPCs and have some actual arguments. I think focusing even more on the rules would harm the roleplay. I played quite a bit Exalted. In the second edition it had extensive social combat mechanics. They were quite involved. They also allowed the demigod characters of the game to convince people of things that it was sometimes really hard to conceptualise as any way possible in the real life. But the player had spent their points on these skills and powers, so it would have been unfair to deny them. With super socially focused characters we just kinda gave up on the roleplay. Player: "I convince him on the thing." Me: "How?" Player: "I have no idea. I can't imagine how anyone could ever convince a person this way. But the rules say that I easily can." Me: "Fair enough, roll your bucket of dice." And even worse. The rules would allow the NPCs do the same to the PC. I never used social skills and powers on PCs that way, as to me it would just feel wrong to rob the player agency that way, but by RAW that's how it should have worked. I don't want this. I don't want any of this. I want to have real conversations where people play their characters and make real arguments in-character. We might roll the dice at the end, but it is mostly just real conversation, and the DC of the check will be based on how likely I feel the NPC is to be convinced by the PCs argument, so what you say matters. And I think a lot of people who are new to D&D want this too. Critical Role has been one of the biggest influences to people to get to into the game. It is all about people immersing in their characters and talking in-character. It is wise for D&D to focus their support on this type of play. And you don't need to be a professional actor to do this. But presumably anyone who is playing this game in the first place can speak, so they can say what their character says or at least paraphrase it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Styles of D&D Play
Top