Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
sudden persist feat
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="eamon" data-source="post: 4129184" data-attributes="member: 51942"><p>Well, these other cases aren't much different from DMM-Persist. Since a "Sudden Persist" feat would be most similar to DMM-Persist, I don't see additional troubles. That is, the "unfairness" already exists and this is no different. Anyspell (good catch!) is a special case, and I feel that a uniform treatment is in order: a sudden persist feat should work like divine metamagic, and that means it should only apply to divine spells. If you consider Anyspell to be a divine spell, then your DMM problems will be greater than sudden persist's, but given that anyspell says it "allows you to read and prepare any arcane spell" and "When you cast the arcane spell, it works just as though cast by a wizard of your cleric level" which to me indicates it's an arcane spell, to which DMM-Persist and by extension Sudden Persist should not function.</p><p></p><p>So, the modified Sudden Persist would have Sudden Extend as prerequisite, and apply only to spells <em>on the cleric spell list</em> which satisfy the requirements as specified in Persist Spell. This is subtly stricter from the DMM specification which is a little more lenient, but needlessly complex, that only applies to <em>divine</em> spells that <em>you know</em> (both of which incidentally should prohibit anyspell abuse, IMHO).</p><p></p><p>Looking through the wizard spells, I see quite a few worrisome examples. Some of those are 5th level or lower, but many are in the 6-8th range (I've never played a game including casters capable of casting 9th level spells). Simple things like lightning ring (two free action 5d6 lightning bolts each round, and more electrical effects) look pretty nasty, and all the Bite of... spells are there, there's wraithstike, iron body, and weird things like gutsnake and superior invisibility...</p><p></p><p>I don't think a wizard's spell list is balanced with a feat like sudden persist, though isolated spells like fire shield are probably fine. Maybe it's fine despite the wizards different spell list, but it's a more risky choice than allowing sudden persist for cleric spells.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="eamon, post: 4129184, member: 51942"] Well, these other cases aren't much different from DMM-Persist. Since a "Sudden Persist" feat would be most similar to DMM-Persist, I don't see additional troubles. That is, the "unfairness" already exists and this is no different. Anyspell (good catch!) is a special case, and I feel that a uniform treatment is in order: a sudden persist feat should work like divine metamagic, and that means it should only apply to divine spells. If you consider Anyspell to be a divine spell, then your DMM problems will be greater than sudden persist's, but given that anyspell says it "allows you to read and prepare any arcane spell" and "When you cast the arcane spell, it works just as though cast by a wizard of your cleric level" which to me indicates it's an arcane spell, to which DMM-Persist and by extension Sudden Persist should not function. So, the modified Sudden Persist would have Sudden Extend as prerequisite, and apply only to spells [i]on the cleric spell list[/i] which satisfy the requirements as specified in Persist Spell. This is subtly stricter from the DMM specification which is a little more lenient, but needlessly complex, that only applies to [i]divine[/i] spells that [i]you know[/i] (both of which incidentally should prohibit anyspell abuse, IMHO). Looking through the wizard spells, I see quite a few worrisome examples. Some of those are 5th level or lower, but many are in the 6-8th range (I've never played a game including casters capable of casting 9th level spells). Simple things like lightning ring (two free action 5d6 lightning bolts each round, and more electrical effects) look pretty nasty, and all the Bite of... spells are there, there's wraithstike, iron body, and weird things like gutsnake and superior invisibility... I don't think a wizard's spell list is balanced with a feat like sudden persist, though isolated spells like fire shield are probably fine. Maybe it's fine despite the wizards different spell list, but it's a more risky choice than allowing sudden persist for cleric spells. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
sudden persist feat
Top