Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Elric" data-source="post: 4523073" data-attributes="member: 1139">Nitro has already gone &quot;this round&quot; as well, if you mean what Matt just resolved. I think Matt got out of order somehow when he said (Since Wren is first to go, I'll adjudicate this)He resolved Wren's action at the top of the round he just resolved (where Nitro KOd Megalodon).&nbsp; But Wren is after Star and before Nitro.&nbsp; So he shouldn't be the next one to go after what Matt just posted.&nbsp; Or maybe the mistake was somewhere else and Nitro and Optic really are the next two up.&nbsp; Clarification appreciatedIdea: another pbp I'm in has people posting round #s with their actions, the GM posting what round # it is that he's adjudicated, and the players have taken to posting their initiative counts as well.&nbsp; If an action said:Nitro, round 5, Initiative 7 then it would be a lot easier to keep track of these things.&nbsp; Then if Matt is resolving &quot;round 5&quot; it's easy for him to see who is doing what, and when.&nbsp; This way people won't get skipped and/or resolved twice incorrectly.Most of us are already keeping track of our HPs in our posts, which is another thing we should all be doing.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Elric, post: 4523073, member: 1139"] Nitro has already gone "this round" as well, if you mean what Matt just resolved. I think Matt got out of order somehow when he said (Since Wren is first to go, I'll adjudicate this) He resolved Wren's action at the top of the round he just resolved (where Nitro KOd Megalodon). But Wren is after Star and before Nitro. So he shouldn't be the next one to go after what Matt just posted. Or maybe the mistake was somewhere else and Nitro and Optic really are the next two up. Clarification appreciated Idea: another pbp I'm in has people posting round #s with their actions, the GM posting what round # it is that he's adjudicated, and the players have taken to posting their initiative counts as well. If an action said: Nitro, round 5, Initiative 7 then it would be a lot easier to keep track of these things. Then if Matt is resolving "round 5" it's easy for him to see who is doing what, and when. This way people won't get skipped and/or resolved twice incorrectly. Most of us are already keeping track of our HPs in our posts, which is another thing we should all be doing. [/QUOTE]

Verification