Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Sword Coast Legends To Introduce RAGE OF DEMONS and Tile Based Editor
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jester David" data-source="post: 7685732" data-attributes="member: 37579"><p>That's really getting nit-picky. </p><p>The bar isn't 100% fidelity or nothing. <em>Baldur's Gate</em> and <em>Icewind Dale </em>were certainly closer to adhering to the 2nd Edition ruleset that, well, many of the actual games of 2e I played with friends. And much, much closer than SCL.</p><p></p><p></p><p>They listed three games as examples: <em>Baldur's Gate</em>, <em>Icewind Dale</em> and <em>Neverwinter.</em> Those three out of the dozens of D&D video games. (Almost 100 all told). They didn't go with <em>Iron & Blood: Warriors of Ravenloft</em> or <em>Tower of Doom</em> or <em>Eye of the Beholder</em> or even <em>Baldur's Gate: Dark Alliance</em>. They went with three games that were really, really close ports of the D&D ruleset. </p><p>That gave a false impression. To say nothing of the "gameplay and sensibilities" or "stayed true to the D&D ruleset" lines. </p><p></p><p></p><p>It's pretty far away. There's a lot of cosmetic application of the rules, things with a similar name, but how much the actual ruleset is applied is small. It takes more than just using familiar terms to make things into a D&D game. </p><p>Like having classes actually mean something.</p><p></p><p></p><p>They've totally been deceptive. They promised something they didn't deliver. Whether they did so intentionally or just through ignorance is another matter, but the fact remains people were led to believe they were anticipating and buying a game that was a modern take on <em>Baldur's Gate. </em></p><p><em></em>And, frankly, that likely hurt the game because they weren't marketing the game to people who might be interested and weren't focusing on that style of play. Had they been honest from the start they would have gotten less attention, but they wouldn't have upset as many people dragging down their rating.</p><p></p><p>So, you like the game. Okay, that's fair. No one is saying you're not allowed to find the game fun. But you don't need to defend the developers. Their degree of honesty has no bearing on your enjoyment of the game.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jester David, post: 7685732, member: 37579"] That's really getting nit-picky. The bar isn't 100% fidelity or nothing. [I]Baldur's Gate[/I] and [I]Icewind Dale [/I]were certainly closer to adhering to the 2nd Edition ruleset that, well, many of the actual games of 2e I played with friends. And much, much closer than SCL. They listed three games as examples: [I]Baldur's Gate[/I], [I]Icewind Dale[/I] and [I]Neverwinter.[/I] Those three out of the dozens of D&D video games. (Almost 100 all told). They didn't go with [I]Iron & Blood: Warriors of Ravenloft[/I] or [I]Tower of Doom[/I] or [I]Eye of the Beholder[/I] or even [I]Baldur's Gate: Dark Alliance[/I]. They went with three games that were really, really close ports of the D&D ruleset. That gave a false impression. To say nothing of the "gameplay and sensibilities" or "stayed true to the D&D ruleset" lines. It's pretty far away. There's a lot of cosmetic application of the rules, things with a similar name, but how much the actual ruleset is applied is small. It takes more than just using familiar terms to make things into a D&D game. Like having classes actually mean something. They've totally been deceptive. They promised something they didn't deliver. Whether they did so intentionally or just through ignorance is another matter, but the fact remains people were led to believe they were anticipating and buying a game that was a modern take on [I]Baldur's Gate. [/I]And, frankly, that likely hurt the game because they weren't marketing the game to people who might be interested and weren't focusing on that style of play. Had they been honest from the start they would have gotten less attention, but they wouldn't have upset as many people dragging down their rating. So, you like the game. Okay, that's fair. No one is saying you're not allowed to find the game fun. But you don't need to defend the developers. Their degree of honesty has no bearing on your enjoyment of the game. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Sword Coast Legends To Introduce RAGE OF DEMONS and Tile Based Editor
Top