Not exactly; it doesn't make any assumptions about how many failed checks you make, or what their results are. It just assumes that you fail some number of times, and then get one result at your skill modifier +20. And the whole thing takes 20 times as long as a normal check.Lamoni said:
The distinction almost never matters, because natural 1s and 20s have no special effects on skill checks, and you cannot take 20 if the number of failed checks matters at all. But in campaigns that use critical fumbles or other house rules, rolling the sequence can have weird implications. So it's usually better not to open that can of worms in the first place.
Last edited:
