Teflon Billy has a review up for A Game of Thrones OGL

[Obryn]

...and I think it's one of the most entertaining reviews I've read in a while.

I'm gonna be picking this one up.

http://www.enworld.org/reviews.php?do=review&reviewid=2713645

-O

 

[Maester Luwin]

Hey Obryn! You will not be sorry! Thanks Maester Luwin

 

[Skyman]

Yep, good choice Obryn. Teflon nails my view of the GoT RPG. I thought it would likely be a rather boring and overly simple 'non-magic DnD', but it's actually quite varied and complex, though elegant. It really captures the feel of the setting.

 

[Maester Luwin]

Hey T Billy! Good review BTW! Thanks Maester Luwin

 

[Monkeybar Genius]

*snip* -Darkness for mostof the review he's noteven talfking about the book

 

[Darkness]

Welcome to the boards, Monkeybar Genius. Please be aware that name-calling and personal attacks aren't allowed.

 

[Teflon Billy]

What was it he said?

 

[Morrus]

What was it he said?

Umm... Jeff? Do you know this person?

 

[Angel Tarragon]

Great review T-Bill. I thoroughly enjoyed it.

 

[ColonelHardisson]

The thing about TB's reviews, especially as he's matured as a writer, is that they first and foremost entertain the reader. Second, they give a view of the reviewer himself.

The first point is of obvious importance, especially in a review of the type of subject matter we're dealing with.

The second point may elude some. Knowing the reviewer's mind and attitude can give the reader an idea of whether he and the reviewer are on the same wavelength. If they click as far as the review is concerned, the possibility of them clicking in regards to what is being reviewed is greater. I don't have any empirical evidence to support this, but it seems intuitively obvious to me.