Majoru Oakheart said:
Yes, but I allow the players to use any of the books I own when making their characters and the DMs I play with also allow the same thing. I hate restricting player's choices based on the fact that the tool that we are using to generate characters doesn't yet have that book available or I didn't feel like paying to download a dataset that had it in it.
I'm not sure what that has to do with my statement that only datasets are only available for sale for eTools and PCGen, yet you can create the datasets yourself if you wish.
Majoru Oakheart said:
I don't currently use any programs for character generation for this one reason. I used to use PCGen continuously back in the day it had all of the books available at the time built into it. I still maintain that legally, it's dubious as to whether or not the small amount of information in these datasets actually counts as breaking the copyright.
That was WotC's stand when the board, at the time, sat down with Anthony Valterra, then Brand Manager of D&D.
Majoru Oakheart said:
I was one of the developers of PCGen when they made the deal with WoTC and the code monkeys decided to trash all the datasets at the time and tell everyone on the developer list to get rid of all copies of the datasets and never to distribute them. I understand that WoTC offered them a deal where they might be able to legally distribute these datasets if they played along and got rid of them temporarily. I agreed with the decision because I thought they were making a deal to distribute datasets for free by being licensed by WoTC. It didn't happen that way, they instead got a deal to fix e-tools and sell datasets and became licensed to sell datasets for PCGen as well. However, the fact that the datasets cost money is what makes them useless to 90% of people who are fairly broke after buying ALL of the books that we need datasets for.
You've got some of your statements skewed. The PCGen board had been trying to talk with WotC over the inclusion of the WotC datasets for some time. At GenCon 2002 they were able to do so. During that conversation, Anthony Valterra said that it was WotC's position that PCGen was infringing upon WotC's IP, and, because of that, PCGen would need to remove the WotC IP-related datasets from distribution. It was mentioned at that time that if PCGen became d20 compliant (which it was for a while) that PCGen may be able to once again distribute said datasets. Now, I was also around at this time. It
was stated that if you had those datasets, you couldn't distribute them because of the IP issues. I don't recall statements saying you had to destroy the copies on your hard drive.
Now, PCGen did not get a deal to fix eTools, that was those folks who run CMP. While there is some overlap in leadership, the two entities are separate in what they do.
I am not an agent of CMP, however, I'm sure that the permission to distribute Wotc IP in the form of datasets comes with a licensing fee. They pass this on to their customers. Also, they pay the folks who create the datasets for them.
And as I said earlier, you can create the material you want yourself without having to buy the datasets.
Majoru Oakheart said:
Sorry, I don't mean to sound like a rant. I still think that sales of e-tools or RPG Toolkit would probably double or triple if the datasets were free, thereby making up the money they'd be making from datasets currently. Of course, I could be wrong.
On that, I can not comment because I have no knowledge on the marketing/business decisions on these license datasets.