Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="EzekielRaiden" data-source="post: 9279477" data-attributes="member: 6790260">My hubris has struck again, and I have kinda-sorta-not-exactly volunteered to do a thing, a new alternative to the now somewhat long-in-the-tooth &quot;Survivor&quot; threads. But my first notion, &quot;PHB classes through the ages,&quot; almost immediately met with some reminders that I don't actually know all the options folks once had.So, I'd like folks to chime in! I may or may not actually use all the stuff folks recommend, but at the very least it will be a knowing and intentional exclusion, not an accidental oopsie.Three caveats I will note to head some things off at the pass:<ul>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">It needs to come from a core book, though I am not going to harp too hard on precision there. Being called a &quot;PHB&quot; is a shoe-in, of course, but other &quot;core&quot;/&quot;base&quot; classes are likely to pass muster.</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">I am allowing PF1e stuff because it really is &quot;3.75e&quot; in most ways. I will not be including new stuff only found in PF2e.</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">I will be combining certain classes together that are fundamentally the same archetype. E.g. &quot;Thief-Acrobat&quot; will be (explicitly) part of Rogue/Thief, &quot;Magic-User&quot; will be (explicitly) part of Wizard, etc. I will, however, include Illusionist as a separate option, since that was an intentional separation in some editions.</li>
</ul>So, ye of fulsome years and storied wisdom, regale me with your classes core!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="EzekielRaiden, post: 9279477, member: 6790260"] My hubris has struck again, and I have kinda-sorta-not-exactly volunteered to do a thing, a new alternative to the now somewhat long-in-the-tooth "Survivor" threads. But my first notion, "PHB classes through the ages," almost immediately met with some reminders that I [I]don't[/I] actually know all the options folks once had. So, I'd like folks to chime in! I may or may not actually [I]use[/I] all the stuff folks recommend, but at the very least it will be a knowing and intentional exclusion, not an accidental oopsie. Three caveats I will note to head some things off at the pass: [LIST] [*]It needs to come from a core book, though I am not going to harp [I]too[/I] hard on precision there. Being called a "PHB" is a shoe-in, of course, but other "core"/"base" classes are likely to pass muster. [*]I am allowing PF1e stuff because it really is "3.75e" in most ways. I will not be including new stuff only found in PF2e. [*]I [I]will[/I] be combining certain classes together that are fundamentally the same archetype. E.g. "Thief-Acrobat" will be (explicitly) part of Rogue/Thief, "Magic-User" will be (explicitly) part of Wizard, etc. I will, however, include Illusionist as a separate option, since that was an intentional separation in some editions. [/LIST] So, ye of fulsome years and storied wisdom, regale me with your classes core! [/QUOTE]

Verification