Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="DreamChaser" data-source="post: 4339273" data-attributes="member: 1190">i'm gonna eye roll at this statement (imagine eye roll here since there is no emoticon for that); though I respect the posters right to the opinion I find the opinion itself to be harsh, judgmental, and disrespectful to the professionals who worked to produce the books. Very few other books (other than a gaming book) have such level of internal reflexive references. When something on page 243 is changed, it may affect nothing or it could affect 35 different areas of 3 books. They do their best. Now compare these books to most school text books (another type of book that has intensive internal reflexive referencing) and you'll generally find that such typos are just as or far more common. Ach...I remember studying for my Ed degree and taking a class that was basically a textbook review...it was appalling what was considered "accurate" and "professional" work for use in public school classrooms.Back on topic: There is a logical and syntactic error in assuming that the statement "Temp hp from different sources don't stack," in any way implies anything about temp hp from same sources. It doesn't. You cannot generalize from a negative premise.Regardless, the rule does not even say that. What it says is:DC</blockquote>