Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Campbell" data-source="post: 8247547" data-attributes="member: 16586">The issue here is taking how one person might feel about a given mechanic and applying it universally to a larger population. The same mechanic that helps me develop a connection to the fiction and experience more of what my character experiences might seem off to you. Our brains work in different ways. We all have dramatically different experiences of the world, different insights into the way the world works. The problem I have with &quot;disassociated mechanics&quot; rhetorically is that people were telling people how they must feel about a given mechanic even if it rang true to them. Like for me personally as a life long athlete the energizer bunny fighter rings somewhat less true than limited use abilities even though I also have some issues with the specific implementation. Programming note : I do not want to get into debating the specifics of any mechanics in this thread.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Campbell, post: 8247547, member: 16586"] The issue here is taking how one person might feel about a given mechanic and applying it universally to a larger population. The same mechanic that helps me develop a connection to the fiction and experience more of what my character experiences might seem off to you. Our brains work in different ways. We all have dramatically different experiences of the world, different insights into the way the world works. The problem I have with "disassociated mechanics" rhetorically is that people were telling people how they must feel about a given mechanic even if it rang true to them. Like for me personally as a life long athlete the energizer bunny fighter rings somewhat less true than limited use abilities even though I also have some issues with the specific implementation. Programming note : I do not want to get into debating the specifics of any mechanics in this thread. [/QUOTE]

Verification