Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Horwath" data-source="post: 9525688" data-attributes="member: 6801299">how horrible is rangers capstone in numbers?if you are archer, then you will get only 2 attacks so you will get about +4 damage per round when and IF you concentrate on HM.so you better take 1 level of rogue for +1d6 sneak attack that will actually give you more damage, not a lot more but still you beat the capstone with 1 level dip.and you also get +2 expertise, +1 skill, +2 languages, +2 weapon masteries and I have to mention downside also, you lose 1 HP if you take rogue over ranger at 20th level. hehe.Now, if you take dual wielder, you will have between 3 and 4 attacks per round(DW feat), depending on how much you need to switch HM around, let's call it 3,5 attacks per round.that will net you about +7 damage with capstone or +4,2 damage with the rogue.so you are trading getting less than 3 damage per round more while in melee and one extra HP for losing all rogue utility you get at 1st level.wow, what a Capstone.I wish I was a fly on that wall when the brain trust at WotC conjured that up...</blockquote>