Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mistwell" data-source="post: 9529403" data-attributes="member: 2525">He's making the choices he'd make at each level with an explanation. His explanations make sense. It's not intended to be some objective across the board measurement, it's just a thumb nail sketch of common choices at that level which make sense. Yeah he tends to really value concentration saves.He's not. He's not focusing on damage. That's the issue Zard has. Treantmonk is explicitly saying the build is not an all-damage build, but he is checking the damage for ordinary builds.The build isn't focused on scorching ray I believe he said 50% of spells are non-damaging control spells you'd use and 50% are scorching ray for damage, which is more realistic to how he though he'd make a sorcerer. Zard is taking this out of context and declaring it's a damage focused build because he checks the damage.I have a vague recollection spell sniper is on that build as well.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mistwell, post: 9529403, member: 2525"] He's making the choices he'd make at each level with an explanation. His explanations make sense. It's not intended to be some objective across the board measurement, it's just a thumb nail sketch of common choices at that level which make sense. Yeah he tends to really value concentration saves. He's not. He's not focusing on damage. That's the issue Zard has. Treantmonk is explicitly saying the build is not an all-damage build, but he is checking the damage for ordinary builds. The build isn't focused on scorching ray I believe he said 50% of spells are non-damaging control spells you'd use and 50% are scorching ray for damage, which is more realistic to how he though he'd make a sorcerer. Zard is taking this out of context and declaring it's a damage focused build because he checks the damage. I have a vague recollection spell sniper is on that build as well. [/QUOTE]

Verification