Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Philotomy Jurament" data-source="post: 3615103" data-attributes="member: 20854">I think that's right on the money; and not just with playtests, but with C&C campaigns, in general.  Just from browsing the C&C-oriented boards, you can see that there's a huge amount of house ruling and variety going on.  My C&C games are pretty close to "by the book," but I have a few house-rules, too (initiative and surprise).  Others have codified skill or feat systems (beyond just using the SIEGE engine), changes to the character classes, XP tables, et cetera.C&C reminds me of OD&D(1974) in this: it's a system that seems to invite tinkering and customization.  And individual GMs are running C&C games that are recognizably C&C, but also have noticeable rules differences from campaign-to-campaign.  To me, this isn't a problem, but rather an asset.</blockquote>