Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
The chamberlain, the king, and the dragon (drobe)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Manbearcat" data-source="post: 6223608" data-attributes="member: 6696971"><p>You certainly have enough to attempt something like this.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, these are the sort of conversations that go on at my table galore in various games (D&D 4e included) so they certainly facilitate the style of "indie" play I'm familiar with. Propositions are made by players or offers are made by GMs. We sort it out mechanically and roll the dice to see what happens!</p><p></p><p>I think here, your application of Visions of Avarice is pretty awesome. Perhaps Quinn has enough control over his magic to make something like this happen. Here is what I'm thinking and you tell me what you think. You're at 2:1 and you need to be at 6 before you hit 3 failures.</p><p></p><p>If you want to try to make this happen with your Daily expenditure of Visions of Avarice, how about this proposition; If you are successful at an Arcana check against the Hard DC (28) and then successful at your Attack vs Will (26), you can shape this spell to your liking (as you have devised above) and it won't cause the aggressive effective of VoA. I'll give you 2 successes in this challenge if you can pull it off. If you fail on that Arcana check its basically all bets are off. You're casting the offensive version of VoA and attacking the Dryad. You're KoS just like Lucann in that scenario.</p><p></p><p>If you are indeed successful, you could expend Emerald Eye as your Minor Action beforehand (+5 Insight and + 2 attacks versus Will). You can then spend an AP for a standard Action and then attempt something else (perhaps Insight + 5...or Suggestion is available again as its a new scene). Successes there would put you at 5 of your required 6 and then next round you could try to resolve the issue peaceably with a final success. Given how escalated are, the severity of what you're asking for, its going to be very difficult for me to imagine anything lower than the Hard DC. So you're pretty much looking at DC 28 from here on out. Let me know your thoughts and make a counter-offer if you'd like.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yup, I gotcha.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Manbearcat, post: 6223608, member: 6696971"] You certainly have enough to attempt something like this. Well, these are the sort of conversations that go on at my table galore in various games (D&D 4e included) so they certainly facilitate the style of "indie" play I'm familiar with. Propositions are made by players or offers are made by GMs. We sort it out mechanically and roll the dice to see what happens! I think here, your application of Visions of Avarice is pretty awesome. Perhaps Quinn has enough control over his magic to make something like this happen. Here is what I'm thinking and you tell me what you think. You're at 2:1 and you need to be at 6 before you hit 3 failures. If you want to try to make this happen with your Daily expenditure of Visions of Avarice, how about this proposition; If you are successful at an Arcana check against the Hard DC (28) and then successful at your Attack vs Will (26), you can shape this spell to your liking (as you have devised above) and it won't cause the aggressive effective of VoA. I'll give you 2 successes in this challenge if you can pull it off. If you fail on that Arcana check its basically all bets are off. You're casting the offensive version of VoA and attacking the Dryad. You're KoS just like Lucann in that scenario. If you are indeed successful, you could expend Emerald Eye as your Minor Action beforehand (+5 Insight and + 2 attacks versus Will). You can then spend an AP for a standard Action and then attempt something else (perhaps Insight + 5...or Suggestion is available again as its a new scene). Successes there would put you at 5 of your required 6 and then next round you could try to resolve the issue peaceably with a final success. Given how escalated are, the severity of what you're asking for, its going to be very difficult for me to imagine anything lower than the Hard DC. So you're pretty much looking at DC 28 from here on out. Let me know your thoughts and make a counter-offer if you'd like. Yup, I gotcha. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
The chamberlain, the king, and the dragon (drobe)
Top