... What, Oozes aren't warm and welcoming?Umbran said:I think perhaps the Hivemind needs someone to handle PR for them![]()
I agree. The Hivemind seemed pretty OK with my recent foray of interloping. At least so far. But when I first saw the name, I did think it was a bit odd. One turn off is also sometimes the high post count. I like to be courteous and read everything in a thread before I contribute, which is one of the reasons I haven't been able to say anything in Shilsen's fascinating Paladin thread--its just so long. I think the key to the Hivemind though is that you don't have to read everything. That's one majour plus for jumping right in.Jdvn1 said:The Hivemind tries to be open and welcoming, but I agree with you. Although, to a Hiveminder, the label makes sense. Do you think "General" would be a better label?
Jdvn1 said:I don't think there's much we could do about it now -- I think Hiveminders are attached to that name.
Well, but the Hivemind always wants general participation. At least, the more the merrier. So something should be done about something, but I don't know what.Umbran said:I don't think there's much that should be done about it. If the Hiveminder's like the name, that's all that really matters. They just shouldn't use it when they want general participation.
The Hivemind will just have to live with the disappointment of my non-participation. Nothing they can do about it.Jdvn1 said:Well, but the Hivemind always wants general participation. At least, the more the merrier. So something should be done about something, but I don't know what.
Darkness said:I think it's better if not everyone participates. We have like 1,000 users online at most times.