Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The dominated condition and sneak attack
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DracoSuave" data-source="post: 5465884" data-attributes="member: 71571"><p>Placing shrouds is an action. The dominated creature can take no actions outside of the one the dominator chooses for him.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It absolutely is the PC attacking. The monster is choosing the action, but it is the PC that is attacking for all purposes within the rules. At-will powers that are restricted to ally/enemy status still work the same. Leader powers that give bonuses to allies won't give bonuses to the dominating monster, and powers that assign penalties to enemies won't assign penalties to dominating monster's enemies.</p><p></p><p>"Dominated", like a million other things in 4e, just does NOT mean the same thing it did in 3rd edition, and I think that's the problem. Dominated in 3rd edition meant a full and total control over that character in every single way, and generally for an extended period of time. It COULD turn enemies into allies, and sometimes permanently.</p><p></p><p>4th edition 'dominated' is not total, applies to a single action per round, and goes away in a matter of a few seconds in game time, at the absolute worst case scenario, five minutes later. That's not enough of an effect NOR duration to warrant it a complete change in loyalties of the character.</p><p></p><p>Narratively, the character still has the ability to make some small decisions, particularily if he is granted choices outside of his turn structure. He can still choose to make bonus saving throws if he gets those. He's by no means helplessly under the control of the dominator. He can still 'fight it' and probably is growling in sentance fragments 'GET OUT OF MY HEAD DON'T MAKE ME ATTACK MY FRIENDS.' </p><p></p><p>From the PHB update:</p><p></p><p><em>In spite of this condition, the creature’s allies remain its allies, and its enemies remain its enemies. (Thus, if the dominator makes the creature attack one of its allies, it does not attack an ally of the dominator.) If the dominator tries to force the creature to throw itself into a pit or move into some other form of hindering terrain, the creature gets a saving throw to avoid entering the terrain</em></p><p></p><p></p><p>From a RAW standpoint, there is no debate. The question is answered directly.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DracoSuave, post: 5465884, member: 71571"] Placing shrouds is an action. The dominated creature can take no actions outside of the one the dominator chooses for him. It absolutely is the PC attacking. The monster is choosing the action, but it is the PC that is attacking for all purposes within the rules. At-will powers that are restricted to ally/enemy status still work the same. Leader powers that give bonuses to allies won't give bonuses to the dominating monster, and powers that assign penalties to enemies won't assign penalties to dominating monster's enemies. "Dominated", like a million other things in 4e, just does NOT mean the same thing it did in 3rd edition, and I think that's the problem. Dominated in 3rd edition meant a full and total control over that character in every single way, and generally for an extended period of time. It COULD turn enemies into allies, and sometimes permanently. 4th edition 'dominated' is not total, applies to a single action per round, and goes away in a matter of a few seconds in game time, at the absolute worst case scenario, five minutes later. That's not enough of an effect NOR duration to warrant it a complete change in loyalties of the character. Narratively, the character still has the ability to make some small decisions, particularily if he is granted choices outside of his turn structure. He can still choose to make bonus saving throws if he gets those. He's by no means helplessly under the control of the dominator. He can still 'fight it' and probably is growling in sentance fragments 'GET OUT OF MY HEAD DON'T MAKE ME ATTACK MY FRIENDS.' From the PHB update: [i]In spite of this condition, the creature’s allies remain its allies, and its enemies remain its enemies. (Thus, if the dominator makes the creature attack one of its allies, it does not attack an ally of the dominator.) If the dominator tries to force the creature to throw itself into a pit or move into some other form of hindering terrain, the creature gets a saving throw to avoid entering the terrain[/i] From a RAW standpoint, there is no debate. The question is answered directly. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The dominated condition and sneak attack
Top