Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The dominated condition and sneak attack
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DracoSuave" data-source="post: 5466817" data-attributes="member: 71571"><p>It's not a matter of moving goal posts at all. The goal posts have <strong>have never changed:</strong></p><p></p><p>Ally is a defined rules term.</p><p>Enemy is a defined rules term.</p><p>Creature is a defined rules term.</p><p>How powers interact with regards to targetting allies, enemies, and creatures are defined rules.</p><p>Dominated is a defined rules term.</p><p>Dominated not switching ally nor enemy, nor how they interract with targetting is an explicitly defined rule.</p><p></p><p>All of these rules are explicitly defined. The onus is therefore on you to <strong>find a rule</strong> which counteracts that, something you have yet to do. You have not fulfilled the burden of proof necessary to even suggest the rules intend for ally and enemy to switch! </p><p></p><p>You're trying to make a case that is diametrically opposed to the explicit text of a game rule... that's going to be an uphill battle, and complaining that 'we're moving the goal posts' is wrong... we're playing fair, it's your position that's problematic.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DracoSuave, post: 5466817, member: 71571"] It's not a matter of moving goal posts at all. The goal posts have [b]have never changed:[/b] Ally is a defined rules term. Enemy is a defined rules term. Creature is a defined rules term. How powers interact with regards to targetting allies, enemies, and creatures are defined rules. Dominated is a defined rules term. Dominated not switching ally nor enemy, nor how they interract with targetting is an explicitly defined rule. All of these rules are explicitly defined. The onus is therefore on you to [b]find a rule[/b] which counteracts that, something you have yet to do. You have not fulfilled the burden of proof necessary to even suggest the rules intend for ally and enemy to switch! You're trying to make a case that is diametrically opposed to the explicit text of a game rule... that's going to be an uphill battle, and complaining that 'we're moving the goal posts' is wrong... we're playing fair, it's your position that's problematic. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The dominated condition and sneak attack
Top