Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Smurtis" data-source="post: 5468892" data-attributes="member: 100320">lol, well, i'd like to think of myself as a mature person, with no biased opinion of what is right and wrong.&nbsp; I simply look at the rules laid out for us and support them, unless otherwise proven.&nbsp; I would hope that most of the people who reply here with some intellectual guide, would do the same.&nbsp;My comment with regards to the CS being underpaid, was an exaggeration lol... My point was, that the one SINGLE contact given by ONE person's claim to a private conversation, with the qestion and answer not entirely being explained and provided, may not be a great source to back your entire argument on <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />&nbsp;Personally, if i get 3 CS agents responding with clarity on the subject, I will most certainly reconsider my views and re-examine... Can i change the rule book? no... but will i reply in turn to WotC to perhaps update that ruling? Of course i will... CS agents may or may not be a great source, but they are people just like us (and we dont get paid lol)... some of them may have more knowledge than the next, and some may have more passion than the next... But to listen to just 1 CS agent who didnt even acknowledge the RULES in the books, is a very weak defense to hold on to.&nbsp;BUT!!!!!&nbsp;If they do come back and say that the rule book is right, and that we cant attack allies with &quot;enemy&quot; targets, i hope you in turn would also concede, as i would if the decisions come back in your favour <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Smurtis, post: 5468892, member: 100320"] lol, well, i'd like to think of myself as a mature person, with no biased opinion of what is right and wrong. I simply look at the rules laid out for us and support them, unless otherwise proven. I would hope that most of the people who reply here with some intellectual guide, would do the same. My comment with regards to the CS being underpaid, was an exaggeration lol... My point was, that the one SINGLE contact given by ONE person's claim to a private conversation, with the qestion and answer not entirely being explained and provided, may not be a great source to back your entire argument on ;) Personally, if i get 3 CS agents responding with clarity on the subject, I will most certainly reconsider my views and re-examine... Can i change the rule book? no... but will i reply in turn to WotC to perhaps update that ruling? Of course i will... CS agents may or may not be a great source, but they are people just like us (and we dont get paid lol)... some of them may have more knowledge than the next, and some may have more passion than the next... But to listen to just 1 CS agent who didnt even acknowledge the RULES in the books, is a very weak defense to hold on to. BUT!!!!! If they do come back and say that the rule book is right, and that we cant attack allies with "enemy" targets, i hope you in turn would also concede, as i would if the decisions come back in your favour :) [/QUOTE]

Verification