• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

The final "How old are you?" thread

In what year were you born?

  • 2000

    Votes: 1 0.1%
  • 1999

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 1998

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 1997

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 1996

    Votes: 1 0.1%
  • 1995

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 1994

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 1993

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 1992

    Votes: 2 0.2%
  • 1991

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 1990

    Votes: 1 0.1%
  • 1989

    Votes: 6 0.7%
  • 1988

    Votes: 10 1.1%
  • 1987

    Votes: 10 1.1%
  • 1986

    Votes: 14 1.6%
  • 1985

    Votes: 21 2.4%
  • 1984

    Votes: 18 2.1%
  • 1983

    Votes: 20 2.3%
  • 1982

    Votes: 21 2.4%
  • 1981

    Votes: 26 3.0%
  • 1980

    Votes: 20 2.3%
  • 1979

    Votes: 22 2.5%
  • 1978

    Votes: 25 2.9%
  • 1977

    Votes: 23 2.6%
  • 1976

    Votes: 52 6.0%
  • 1975

    Votes: 40 4.6%
  • 1974

    Votes: 97 11.1%
  • 1973

    Votes: 65 7.5%
  • 1972

    Votes: 57 6.5%
  • 1971

    Votes: 56 6.4%
  • 1970

    Votes: 47 5.4%
  • 1969

    Votes: 48 5.5%
  • 1968

    Votes: 32 3.7%
  • 1967

    Votes: 32 3.7%
  • 1966

    Votes: 17 2.0%
  • 1965

    Votes: 18 2.1%
  • 1964

    Votes: 14 1.6%
  • 1963

    Votes: 9 1.0%
  • 1962

    Votes: 12 1.4%
  • 1961

    Votes: 2 0.2%
  • 1960

    Votes: 11 1.3%
  • 1959

    Votes: 6 0.7%
  • 1958

    Votes: 2 0.2%
  • 1957

    Votes: 3 0.3%
  • 1956

    Votes: 3 0.3%
  • 1955

    Votes: 1 0.1%
  • 1954

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 1953

    Votes: 1 0.1%
  • 1952

    Votes: 2 0.2%
  • 1951

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 1950

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 1949

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 1948

    Votes: 1 0.1%
  • 1947

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 1946

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 1945

    Votes: 1 0.1%
  • 1944

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 1943

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 1942

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 1941 or earlier

    Votes: 1 0.1%

Frukathka said:

If you scroll back up to post #123, I think you'll see that your reply to me was a bit of a non-sequiter... which is what I'm poking fun at. "I fear the man..." -> "that would be my sister" :uhoh: :)

-- N
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Nifft said:
If you scroll back up to post #123, I think you'll see that your reply to me was a bit of a non-sequiter... which is what I'm poking fun at. "I fear the man..." -> "that would be my sister" :uhoh: :)
Oh! :heh: For some reason it just didn't click.
 

non-sequitors don't tend to make obvious sense.

for example, i ate an apple today. then, a duck stole my shower. after that, i fell off a cliff.
 

BOZ said:
non-sequitors don't tend to make obvious sense.

for example, i ate an apple today. then, a duck stole my shower. after that, i fell off a cliff.
Non-sequiturs OTOH are conclusions that don't follow logically.
"I ate an apple today, so a duck stole my shower" is a non-sequitur.
"i ate an apple today. Then, a duck stole my shower" is just a statement of two random unrelated events, a non-non-sequitur.
 

tarchon said:
Non-sequiturs OTOH are conclusions that don't follow logically.
"I ate an apple today, so a duck stole my shower" is a non-sequitur.
"i ate an apple today. Then, a duck stole my shower" is just a statement of two random unrelated events, a non-non-sequitur.

I'm in the Non-Sequiter Society, but I love pizza.

-- N
 


tarchon said:
Non-sequiturs OTOH are conclusions that don't follow logically.
"I ate an apple today, so a duck stole my shower" is a non-sequitur.
"i ate an apple today. Then, a duck stole my shower" is just a statement of two random unrelated events, a non-non-sequitur.

you just ruined my life!!!! :(

because a duck stole my shower.
 


Mark said:
30,000 users and only 561 votes in the poll? There are often times at any point in the day when there are twice as many online. This needs a boost... :)

It's been in my .sig for the last few days, but it's still only about 650.


glass.
 

Nifft's membership notwithstanding, Glass's signature should help the count.
I bump threads, because unlike me, ducks aren't vegetarians.

I still was born in 1974. Cool how this thread hasn't yet been rendered obsolete, isn't it?

Isn't it?!
 

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top