Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Deset Gled" data-source="post: 8708927" data-attributes="member: 7808">This is really what is boils down to.  [USER=7026594]@Mannahnin[/USER], [USER=6796468]@Steampunkette[/USER], and [USER=19857]@Jer[/USER] are also all completely correct in their reasoning.  But at the end of the day a legal claim has been filed and it has to play out.It's worth noting that TSR2 with Jayson Elliot actually pulled it off.  They used the name TSR and published Top Secret material.  There's nothing stopping multiple trademarks of the same name from existing, they just have to separate themselves in the marketplace.  TSR2 was smart and walked the line; they never claimed to be the original TSR, they got new logos, they used Top Secret because it's a very generic title that was easy to build on without touching existing IP, etc.NuTSR, OTOH, did absolutely everything wrong in a textbook way.  Just like they screwed up the LLC filings that should have provided financial protections.  All they had to do was follow a set of rules and they could have gotten away with it (at the very least, the DHSM should have been safe).  Instead, they chose to be the proverbial <a href="https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Pigeon_chess" target="_blank">pigeon on the chess board</a>.</blockquote>