Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Deset Gled" data-source="post: 8846575" data-attributes="member: 7808">The judge read Lanasa's filing.  Formatting and emphasis mine.-----ORDER. The Court is in receipt of Plaintiffs' [17] letter. As stated in the Court's 11/28/2022 Order, Defendant properly followed Rule III(B) of Chambers Practices in filing a motion for a pre motion conference prior to filing the anticipated motion to dismiss. The Defendant's [14] motion therefore was not a request for an extension of time, but a request to schedule a required pre motion conference. Full briefing and motions papers may not be filed until after the Court sets a briefing schedule at a pre motion conference.Accordingly, the Pre Motion Hearing remains set for 01/06/2023 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 6C South before Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto. The parties shall appear by telephone. The parties shall dial into the conference by calling 1-888-******* and entering the following access code: *******. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 12/2/2022. (AA) (Entered: 12/02/2022)-----Translation: OMG, STFU, C U in court on Jan 6th.  Sounds like there is a very real chance this case could be dismissed.  My understanding is that it's extremely rare to get a summary dismissal this early on, but Lanasa has had such a crap showing so far that it may actually happen.</blockquote>