Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Full & Glorious History of NuTSR
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Wincenworks" data-source="post: 9030873" data-attributes="member: 7038835"><p>That was already settled in the US <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monkey_selfie_copyright_dispute" target="_blank">thanks to PETA trying to use copyright to backdoor in giving human rights to animals</a>.</p><p></p><p>Only a human may create art. The AI is not a human, it is a tool.</p><p></p><p>That AI art generators operate on prompts means that the only thing that could foreseeably be copyrighted is the prompt, which is almost certainly never going to be unique and complex enough to attract copyright.</p><p></p><p>All of the artistic decisions in AI art are made algorithmically, therefore are matters of fact and data, and cannot attract copyright. Only human decisions can. There is no foreseeable future where AI attracts copyright on its own, only the changes made by the humans do.</p><p></p><p>So in this case, what OSR Games LLC has "copyrighted" is the placement of the text overlay on the top - which is kind of hilarious since it implies that he thinks someone else wants to make a sign for his business.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, one, that it's a human who operates on a lifetime of information, free will, etc. The computer doesn't do any of that, it doesn't understand anything, especially the concepts of the art that it is. It doesn't know what a person is, what ramen is, what eating is - it just scans information that is loaded into it and interpreted for it by humans and then generates something that it thinks matches the patterns.</p><p></p><p>This is why AI art continually generates highly polished gibberish, instead of varying degrees of technical understanding work that is based around a concept - something with AI "artists" are struggling with now that they've been trying for long enough to get it to create a specific image and are finding the AI can't approach it because it doesn't understand the concepts, and can't enter into a conversation with you.</p><p></p><p>This weird "it's like a person" rhetoric only makes sense if you want to also assign pseudo-human status to:</p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">autocorrect</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">spell check</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">this forum software</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Rhoombas</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">spreadsheets</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">calculators</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">light sensitive switches</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">rice cookers</li> </ul><p></p><p>The delusion that something which does something we associate with a human (even something as looking like it has eyes) is alive/human etc is an ancient one based in our attempts to build narratives that make sense of the patterns we observe, but the AI art generator is no more an artist than a pet rock is a listener.</p><p></p><p>This particular delusion compounds because people assume that if an image is created, and its complicated - it must attract copyright. This is the general rule, but there are many exceptions such as if you recreate something that is already in public domain, do it under circumstances were you agree not to apply a copyright (part of an open license) etc. AI art has created a whole new branch of this because they've made an algorithm which interprets data to make an image.</p><p></p><p>Thus is can violate copyright, but it can't create images that attract copyright and more than the contents of the periodic table can.</p><p></p><p>Not unlike how it seems Justin thought he could bypass the copyrights on the images that make up TSR trademarks by drawing copies of TSR The Game Wizards logo and the Mike Bell Lizard Man - deliberately trying to recreate the images as faithfully as possible and then later hiring someone who can draw (reminder, Justin is supposed to be a tattoo artist) to make the current one which is a lovely homage work by Diesel, but is definitely <a href="https://tsdr.uspto.gov/documentviewer?caseId=sn90124788&docId=DRW20200823055309#docIndex=23&page=1" target="_blank">not the image Justin submitted to the Trademark office</a>.</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]286144[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Wincenworks, post: 9030873, member: 7038835"] That was already settled in the US [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monkey_selfie_copyright_dispute']thanks to PETA trying to use copyright to backdoor in giving human rights to animals[/URL]. Only a human may create art. The AI is not a human, it is a tool. That AI art generators operate on prompts means that the only thing that could foreseeably be copyrighted is the prompt, which is almost certainly never going to be unique and complex enough to attract copyright. All of the artistic decisions in AI art are made algorithmically, therefore are matters of fact and data, and cannot attract copyright. Only human decisions can. There is no foreseeable future where AI attracts copyright on its own, only the changes made by the humans do. So in this case, what OSR Games LLC has "copyrighted" is the placement of the text overlay on the top - which is kind of hilarious since it implies that he thinks someone else wants to make a sign for his business. Well, one, that it's a human who operates on a lifetime of information, free will, etc. The computer doesn't do any of that, it doesn't understand anything, especially the concepts of the art that it is. It doesn't know what a person is, what ramen is, what eating is - it just scans information that is loaded into it and interpreted for it by humans and then generates something that it thinks matches the patterns. This is why AI art continually generates highly polished gibberish, instead of varying degrees of technical understanding work that is based around a concept - something with AI "artists" are struggling with now that they've been trying for long enough to get it to create a specific image and are finding the AI can't approach it because it doesn't understand the concepts, and can't enter into a conversation with you. This weird "it's like a person" rhetoric only makes sense if you want to also assign pseudo-human status to: [LIST] [*]autocorrect [*]spell check [*]this forum software [*]Rhoombas [*]spreadsheets [*]calculators [*]light sensitive switches [*]rice cookers [/LIST] The delusion that something which does something we associate with a human (even something as looking like it has eyes) is alive/human etc is an ancient one based in our attempts to build narratives that make sense of the patterns we observe, but the AI art generator is no more an artist than a pet rock is a listener. This particular delusion compounds because people assume that if an image is created, and its complicated - it must attract copyright. This is the general rule, but there are many exceptions such as if you recreate something that is already in public domain, do it under circumstances were you agree not to apply a copyright (part of an open license) etc. AI art has created a whole new branch of this because they've made an algorithm which interprets data to make an image. Thus is can violate copyright, but it can't create images that attract copyright and more than the contents of the periodic table can. Not unlike how it seems Justin thought he could bypass the copyrights on the images that make up TSR trademarks by drawing copies of TSR The Game Wizards logo and the Mike Bell Lizard Man - deliberately trying to recreate the images as faithfully as possible and then later hiring someone who can draw (reminder, Justin is supposed to be a tattoo artist) to make the current one which is a lovely homage work by Diesel, but is definitely [URL='https://tsdr.uspto.gov/documentviewer?caseId=sn90124788&docId=DRW20200823055309#docIndex=23&page=1']not the image Justin submitted to the Trademark office[/URL]. [ATTACH type="full"]286144[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Full & Glorious History of NuTSR
Top