Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Dannyalcatraz" data-source="post: 9048666" data-attributes="member: 19675">I understand, but if that video gets admitted as evidence*, it makes him look less than truthful.  That weakens his testimony.  If his intent was to pick his words carefully, he kinda did it backwards.To illustrate: consider the OJ trial, in which 4 detectives with a combined 80 years of experience testified that OJ was not a suspect in Nicole Simpson’s death when they made their initial contact with him.  This, despite it being homicide investigation 101 that a murdered woman is far more likely to be killed by a significant other or ex than anyone else in her circle, AND that one detective had even been to the Simpson estate on a domestic violence call as a patrol officer.  Their testimony on this aspect planted the seed they were either liars or incompetent.Simply saying something like, “I can’t say for sure, but Ark Test’s comments strongly resemble those Justin LaNasa** has made in the past.” would be truthful and accurate.* and remember, he explicitly stated he was trying to get those comments recorded on screen for later use.** or “someone we know“, etc.</blockquote>