Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Full & Glorious History of NuTSR
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Wincenworks" data-source="post: 9074259" data-attributes="member: 7038835"><p>Okay so moving on past conspiracy theories that are just rants about people who are not nuTSR.</p><p></p><p>Justin's lawyer didn't file a challenge to they lifting of the stay, probably because the judge's order makes it very clear there was no case law in that jurisdiction that would have given cause, but a lot of persuasive case law from others that indicates they could be even more casual about lifting it if they wanted to.</p><p></p><p>But he did file a request for a conference so that he can whine that Tenkar's lawyers are being mean to him about his demands in Discovery (reminder, they filed to dismiss this and Discovery is one of the most expensive parts of a cases...)</p><p></p><p>It um... it really raises some questions about wtf they're asking for. The only evidence he includes in his submission is his own weird email to Tenkar's lawyers, and it's... not very persuasive.</p><p></p><p>Like he literally starts by admitting he's jumping the gun...</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]290754[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>Then he basically tells everyone and God that his demands have been unreasonable...</p><p>[ATTACH=full]290755[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]290756[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>And then he goes on to point out he didn't really read the answer they submitted, where they explained that the content he alleges exists doesn't actually and that's why he's just provided a bunch of YouTube links instead of transcripts/evidence.</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]290757[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>Then clarifies that the reason they're calling it a fishing trip and saying his demands are way, way outside the scope of the lawsuit as he wants the all the private communication and documents between Tenkar, Tenkar's wife, and Tenkar's mom; and fourteen people (five less than was on the original haters list - speculate as you will but I am confident this time David Flor made the list)</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]290759[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>So basically, while the action sits on a knife edge... Justin's lawyer decides to notify the public that this lawsuit was based almost entirely on tinfoil-hat conspiracies and the assumption that if they asked for enough eventually some incriminating evidence would appear.</p><p></p><p>That's certainly a choice...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Wincenworks, post: 9074259, member: 7038835"] Okay so moving on past conspiracy theories that are just rants about people who are not nuTSR. Justin's lawyer didn't file a challenge to they lifting of the stay, probably because the judge's order makes it very clear there was no case law in that jurisdiction that would have given cause, but a lot of persuasive case law from others that indicates they could be even more casual about lifting it if they wanted to. But he did file a request for a conference so that he can whine that Tenkar's lawyers are being mean to him about his demands in Discovery (reminder, they filed to dismiss this and Discovery is one of the most expensive parts of a cases...) It um... it really raises some questions about wtf they're asking for. The only evidence he includes in his submission is his own weird email to Tenkar's lawyers, and it's... not very persuasive. Like he literally starts by admitting he's jumping the gun... [ATTACH type="full" alt="Secondly, the Defendants have included repetitious arguments in their Response that are not related to Discovery but merely a repetition of their attempt to seek dismissal. This is an Interrogatory, not a Motion or Memorandum of Law. This is improper and does not comply with the Rules. See Answer No. 9. Thirdly, As the Defendants have failed to file an Answer as yet, and it is unknown to what extent any Affirmative Defenses will be raised, and whether any Counter-Claims will be filed, and the expansive and liberal nature of Discovery, none of the Interrogatories, or Demands are outside the scope of reasonable and acceptable Discovery."]290754[/ATTACH] Then he basically tells everyone and God that his demands have been unreasonable... [ATTACH type="full" alt="Fourthly, the position that a demand is a “fishing expedition” as a defense to not responding, as Counsel hopefully should know is an unacceptable and irresponsible response."]290755[/ATTACH] [ATTACH type="full" alt="Sixthly, objections that a Demand is “not proportional to the needs of this case” is further rejected as being completely indecipherable."]290756[/ATTACH] And then he goes on to point out he didn't really read the answer they submitted, where they explained that the content he alleges exists doesn't actually and that's why he's just provided a bunch of YouTube links instead of transcripts/evidence. [ATTACH type="full" alt="Seventh, a response such as “Defendants simply have not engaged in any publications”, in the absence of an answer is unclear. See Response No. 20. Are the Defendants denying that they published any of the cited examples of defamation in the Amended Complaint? If so, this is not the proper place to do so, but in the Defendants’ Answer."]290757[/ATTACH] Then clarifies that the reason they're calling it a fishing trip and saying his demands are way, way outside the scope of the lawsuit as he wants the all the private communication and documents between Tenkar, Tenkar's wife, and Tenkar's mom; and fourteen people (five less than was on the original haters list - speculate as you will but I am confident this time David Flor made the list) [ATTACH type="full" alt="Eighth, the Interrogatories are clear and relate to the case at Bar. For example, Interrogatory/Demand 25 demands “documents, emails, records, and communications in which any of the named Defendants had any contact with the name party below regarding the matters and causes of action set forth in the Amended Complaint, . . .”, and enumerates fourteen persons, some of whom have already been listed as potential witnesses."]290759[/ATTACH] So basically, while the action sits on a knife edge... Justin's lawyer decides to notify the public that this lawsuit was based almost entirely on tinfoil-hat conspiracies and the assumption that if they asked for enough eventually some incriminating evidence would appear. That's certainly a choice... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Full & Glorious History of NuTSR
Top
