NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Wincenworks" data-source="post: 9086045" data-attributes="member: 7038835">Well theoretically it was for from July 2021 - January 2022And like his title for Chief Communications Officer, which is a title where lots of people get paid six figures for in large companies/organizations, but realistically he was doing variable hour work of varying nature and part of his compensation was access to people from the TSR Inc era.The submissions he provided don't include any basis on how he came to this money, there's no mention of hour rates, contracts, etc.  Weirdly also there is plenty mention of his son Logan doing the work... but Logan isn't filing a claim (guess he has more sense than his father).What he really need to do submit was basically a diary of the work that he did, and a basis at what rate he feels he's owed based on the work.  Instead he basically just tried to show that he was exchanging texts with Justin, and well... in legal action there is a principle that you should always use the minimum amount of info you need to make the point, because anything you submit can and will be used against you.  If Michael was submitting that he was a six figure per year professional for instance, it would have been malpractice for any lawyer representing TSR LLC or Justin not to go over some of the more embarrassing parts of that log and ask Michael probing questions about him giving bad advice (supporting mocking/harassing Duck for instance), being a knowing conspirator to things Justin is in court for, etc.Remember the trustee isn't there to punish Justin, or try to give away as much money as possible - he's there to try to get the best outcome for genuine creditors, and eliminate everything else.As a side note, one of the funniest parts about this is how it tries to claim the Secret Cabal will impact the SLAPP on the Defamation.You're allowed to talk naughty word with people who already share the same opinion, because talking naughty word will not cause harm - it won't lower their opinion of you, deny you business opportunities with them, etc.But without going into details - I'm sure Tenkar is also aware of the possibilities - that's why he's specifically clarifying the evidence that directs him toward an opinion of the most likely candidate.</blockquote>

Verification