Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Wincenworks" data-source="post: 9146213" data-attributes="member: 7038835">That is pretty much exactly what has happened - and Justin's lawyer's letter that the judge was dismissive of is essentially claiming that this is some sort of outrageous contempt for the justice system rather than the natural consequence of demanding things that either don't exist or the other side can object to.Hence why the judge's response basically amounts to "I don't know what you want me to do, maybe consider following the process instead of wasting everyone's time - especially your own."Part of it seems to be that he is a criminal defence lawyer, so is used to a standard of discovery that is much, much more in his favour where the prosecution must essentially hand over almost anything that he claims is relevant to the case, whether they think it is or not.</blockquote>