Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Snarf Zagyg" data-source="post: 9158833" data-attributes="member: 7023840">I did enjoy the verbiage.That said, what struck me about that is not the language, although I did track the arguments. In essence, Defense Counsel (Tenkar's attorney) was pointing out that what Plaintiff (LaNasa) did was not proper discovery. Discovery does have rules, and you aren't just supposed to demand "stuff," and, moreover, there are limits (such as the number of interrogatories). Without getting into the more substantive issues, the response basically said, "Plaintiff didn't serve proper discovery, and even though we pointed this out, repeatedly, and even tried to have a good faith conference regarding these failures, Plaintiff is still wasting everyone's time demanding we respond to this."*But what always amazes me when I see documents from other jurisdictions is how different others jurisdictions can operate. Law is always an intensely local practice, and even though I have been fortunate enough to have practiced in multiple areas, I am still amazed at the small differences. The idea of submitting a "letter motion," to a federal court as opposed to a .... motion ... is just weird to me. I've heard that federal courts in New York (similar to local practice) allow for it, but still ... weird. [USER=7808]@Deset Gled[/USER] - thank you for posting this and for keeping abreast of the action. *The superpower of any good attorney is to turn all arguments of fact and law into ones of procedure.</blockquote>

Verification