NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Deset Gled" data-source="post: 9203794" data-attributes="member: 7808">Here are a couple of interesting things I've found in the filings.First, it's worth noting that Lanasa didn't deny sending the police to Don's house or that he tried to block Don from renting convention space.  These actions weren't directly addressed.  Instead, the lawyers just claim there is "bad blood" between the two that was not relevant to Don's status as a witness against Lanasa.Second, I have to agree with Lanasa's side about one critical thing: WotC did not offer definitive proof that Lanasa (et al) were the ones behind the donosemora.com website, or the anonymous emails.  I don't know if they have proof that wasn't shared, or if they are still fishing for info.  But they did get Lanasa to swear, in a formal court document, that he didn't do it.  In fact, he went so far as to say that he never uses anonymous accounts.  Now, if they do manage to prove that it was him later, he'll be in even more trouble for lying about it.  This is my favorite part from Lanasa's declaration on the subject:[ATTACH=full]333902[/ATTACH]I find the idea that anything Lanasa says to be "open, honest, and direct" to be so laughable it wraps around to sad and pathetic.    But that's just my opinion.Finally, ENWorld got another mention in the court docs.  This is from a rundown that Lanasa's lawyer gave of various websites that reported on NuTSR.  The only relevancy is to prove that it was public knowledge that NuTSR had declared bankruptcy.[ATTACH=full]333906[/ATTACH]I wish they spelled the name right, but I don't think we can really expect that from team NuTSR.</blockquote>

Verification