NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Wincenworks" data-source="post: 9207425" data-attributes="member: 7038835">So an update.Justin Lanasa is directly and indirectly (ie through his companies where he is the sole owner and officer) involved in three federal legal proceedings.  All of which he is initiated to some degree - two of them from scratch, one in response to a minor action in the Trademark Office.As of today, in two of those proceedings the other party is moving for sanctions against him.NuTSR v WotCWizards of the Coast have filed their response to the response - and basically cited everything that [USER=7023840]@Snarf Zagyg[/USER] covered in detail - Justin's explanation has no substance, relies up him have rights he waived and included partial confessions.  They're arguing that he should be sanctioned as they originally requested.LaNasa v TenkarJustin's lawyer attempted to withdraw but did not, in the opinion of Tenkar's counsel, apply the proper degree of candour and instead tried to pretend this was just all a mistake rather than that Justin had actively lied - claiming that the record of his criminal misdemeanour was "a different Justin LaNasa" and had been dishonest since the start - tainting the proceeding irrevocably.  They're calling for a dismissal with prejudice, clawback on costs since the start of the action, sanctions (possibly against Justin and his lawyer) and for Justin to have to appear in person before the court to explain himself.[ATTACH=full]335833[/ATTACH]I can only imagine that his opponents in his next political campaigns are going to have some amazing things to say.</blockquote>

Verification