Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Full & Glorious History of NuTSR
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Wincenworks" data-source="post: 9258987" data-attributes="member: 7038835"><p>Documents for the <em>LaNasa vs. Tenkar</em> case have been released, there's... over 100 pages to go over and I have to work and play D&D today so I won't have time to do a full breakdown today, and there's um... there's a lot in there. <a href="https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/65370727/lanasa-v-stiene/" target="_blank">All the docs are on CourtListener</a>.</p><p></p><p>On the key issue of adding Rachel (Tenkar's wife)... Tenkar's lawyers are expectedly, very pointed and include it both in the introduction and as a separate subheading in their motion to dismiss. In the subheading, they point out that they never agreed to accept service on behalf of Rachel, have not been retained by her and are now representing her only in the limited capacity to point out that she has not been served.</p><p></p><p>Justin's lawyer reply is basically:</p><p></p><p>1. He's very confused why this should even be an issue</p><p>2. Since they're representing her now, that should retroactively mean she was served when he served the wrong person</p><p>3. They did not explicitly state at every point they don't represent her, and they still refer to her as a Defendant (they specify she's not properly named)</p><p>4. Their responses to him, have in fact mentioned her... in response to his mentioning of her (so if they agree she exists she must be properly served?)</p><p>5. If they weren't representing her, and he did indeed serve the wrong person... well it should be agreed he actually served the correct person and she should get a lawyer.</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]345441[/ATTACH]</p><p>[ATTACH=full]345443[/ATTACH]</p><p>[ATTACH=full]345445[/ATTACH]</p><p>He also claims that the damages are completely reasonable because of the recent Trump defamation case... where Carroll was receiving death threats and mass harassment after Trump started directly contradicting the court and accusing her of lying... then continued to do so in the court after being told explicitly not to.</p><p>[ATTACH=full]345446[/ATTACH]</p><p>He also claims that Justin LaNasa, the infamous political candidate who did videos for his own businesses, and regularly talks to the press about things he doesn't like... and maintains his own web site about what an amazing guy he is... only became a public figure when Tenkar started making videos.</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]345447[/ATTACH]</p><p>[ATTACH=full]345439[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Wincenworks, post: 9258987, member: 7038835"] Documents for the [I]LaNasa vs. Tenkar[/I] case have been released, there's... over 100 pages to go over and I have to work and play D&D today so I won't have time to do a full breakdown today, and there's um... there's a lot in there. [URL='https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/65370727/lanasa-v-stiene/']All the docs are on CourtListener[/URL]. On the key issue of adding Rachel (Tenkar's wife)... Tenkar's lawyers are expectedly, very pointed and include it both in the introduction and as a separate subheading in their motion to dismiss. In the subheading, they point out that they never agreed to accept service on behalf of Rachel, have not been retained by her and are now representing her only in the limited capacity to point out that she has not been served. Justin's lawyer reply is basically: 1. He's very confused why this should even be an issue 2. Since they're representing her now, that should retroactively mean she was served when he served the wrong person 3. They did not explicitly state at every point they don't represent her, and they still refer to her as a Defendant (they specify she's not properly named) 4. Their responses to him, have in fact mentioned her... in response to his mentioning of her (so if they agree she exists she must be properly served?) 5. If they weren't representing her, and he did indeed serve the wrong person... well it should be agreed he actually served the correct person and she should get a lawyer. [ATTACH type="full" alt="1707263005830.png"]345441[/ATTACH] [ATTACH type="full" alt="1707263153506.png"]345443[/ATTACH] [ATTACH type="full" alt="1707263341955.png"]345445[/ATTACH] He also claims that the damages are completely reasonable because of the recent Trump defamation case... where Carroll was receiving death threats and mass harassment after Trump started directly contradicting the court and accusing her of lying... then continued to do so in the court after being told explicitly not to. [ATTACH type="full" alt="1707263609953.png"]345446[/ATTACH] He also claims that Justin LaNasa, the infamous political candidate who did videos for his own businesses, and regularly talks to the press about things he doesn't like... and maintains his own web site about what an amazing guy he is... only became a public figure when Tenkar started making videos. [ATTACH type="full" alt="1707263783170.png"]345447[/ATTACH] [ATTACH type="full" alt="1707262203189.png"]345439[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Full & Glorious History of NuTSR
Top
