Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
Archive Forums
Hosted Forums
Interactive Story Roleplaying (ISRP)
ISRP Rules and Rulings Reference (OOC)
The future of Juxtaposition - The Vote
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tharivious_Meliamne" data-source="post: 2565122"><p>I'm more concerned with blatant multi-votes being allowed to stand, honestly. The votes that <em>do</em> have matching IP addresses and that <em>were</em> voted in rapid succession from the same IP and are quite obviously something that should result in null votes. As I said, Forgotten Realms is clearly in an unfair advantage situation right now, and unless we are assured somehow that multiple votes will be nullified in an impartial manner, meaning any and all secondary, (tertiary, etc...) votes that possess a matching IP or matching registry email are disqualified until each person's vote is counted once.</p><p></p><p>This is entirely within the bounds of board's software, even InvisionFree's free service allows for this ability with Administrator access, so it should certainly be feasable on paid-for VBulletin access. I don't see how personal human opinion can be factored into something when there are matching IP addresses and matching email addresses involved as hard evidence, even if such immature approaches are taken on multiple sides of the vote. I would prefer to know in advance that the votes will be determined in the strictest manner possible in negating a skewed result, as this is a poll that all of the ISRP community will have to live with, not just a few players with dubious morals regarding the use of an anonymous poll.</p><p></p><p>I just want to be assured that these sorts of votes are dealt with in a proper manner, and that the actual vote of the masses is the one that is finalized, and that Sigil, which is quite clearly the other front runner in this vote, is given a fair and impartial treatment in the final handling of this poll after <em>already</em> coming so far to even be placed on the ballot. The votes don't need to made public, but the result does need to be adjudicated from an impartial standpoint.</p><p></p><p>I don't mean to sound overzealous about this, so forgive me if I do, but I feel that this is too important an issue. I recall on previous polls that matching IP addresses and email addresses were negated entirely, removing even that person's original vote. All I ask is that each voice is counted once, and only once, in the interest of fairness to one and all, and to all settings involved.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tharivious_Meliamne, post: 2565122"] I'm more concerned with blatant multi-votes being allowed to stand, honestly. The votes that [i]do[/i] have matching IP addresses and that [i]were[/i] voted in rapid succession from the same IP and are quite obviously something that should result in null votes. As I said, Forgotten Realms is clearly in an unfair advantage situation right now, and unless we are assured somehow that multiple votes will be nullified in an impartial manner, meaning any and all secondary, (tertiary, etc...) votes that possess a matching IP or matching registry email are disqualified until each person's vote is counted once. This is entirely within the bounds of board's software, even InvisionFree's free service allows for this ability with Administrator access, so it should certainly be feasable on paid-for VBulletin access. I don't see how personal human opinion can be factored into something when there are matching IP addresses and matching email addresses involved as hard evidence, even if such immature approaches are taken on multiple sides of the vote. I would prefer to know in advance that the votes will be determined in the strictest manner possible in negating a skewed result, as this is a poll that all of the ISRP community will have to live with, not just a few players with dubious morals regarding the use of an anonymous poll. I just want to be assured that these sorts of votes are dealt with in a proper manner, and that the actual vote of the masses is the one that is finalized, and that Sigil, which is quite clearly the other front runner in this vote, is given a fair and impartial treatment in the final handling of this poll after [i]already[/i] coming so far to even be placed on the ballot. The votes don't need to made public, but the result does need to be adjudicated from an impartial standpoint. I don't mean to sound overzealous about this, so forgive me if I do, but I feel that this is too important an issue. I recall on previous polls that matching IP addresses and email addresses were negated entirely, removing even that person's original vote. All I ask is that each voice is counted once, and only once, in the interest of fairness to one and all, and to all settings involved. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Archive Forums
Hosted Forums
Interactive Story Roleplaying (ISRP)
ISRP Rules and Rulings Reference (OOC)
The future of Juxtaposition - The Vote
Top