I have to say, I'm no fan of Brandon Sanderson. I couldn't get through Mistborn because of his very poor characters. Aside from his main protagonist, all his characters were pretty much the same. While I've only gotten through most of chapter one, my first instict is, "I really miss Robert Jordan."
Yeah. Read the whole thing in one sitting from about 7pm-3am Tuesday.
TGS is Egwene's Book of Awesome.
Does Rand make an appearance, finally? IIRC, in the last book, Rand was pretty much out of it....most of it was focused on Matt, wasn't it? Rand was still unconscious or recovering from the effects of some battle two books ago, I think?
The cover of the book talks about the growing darkness within Rand. I didn't think he was supposed to be continuing to grow insane, since the Source was cleansed a few books back. Or am I wrong?
Well, Darth, to each his own. While Jordan may not have had great characterization, he wrote with a sophistication that is sorely lacking in Sanderson's work. Mistborn just seemed very amateurish to me, while Jordan wrote with the confidence of a master.
Jordan may have been guilty of prose-bloat and overwrought characters, but he was just more fun to read than Sanderson, who I think needs much more polish.
This is just my opinion, but I doubt Sanderson was the first choice to complete Jordan's work. There are far more writers out there with much more skill who probably turned it down. I asked Joe Abercrombie if he would have considered doing it and he laughed and said something along the lines of, "God, No!" (of course, I asked him via e-mail, I don't personally know the man).
The point is, there are just some things about Sanderson that I dislike. I've heard from others who love his work. To each his own.
You're making a lot of definitive statements for someone claiming "to each their own". Jordan was a talented writer, but at no time did I feel I was reading the work of a "master" (though I'll grant that WoT is sophisticated). While I'm not suggesting that Sanderson is a "master" of fantasy either, to call his work amateurish is frankly just inaccurate. His prose is solid, and his characters, imagery, and plot reinforce the layered and provocative themes of the story. I certainly don't expect everyone to like it, but to deny its quality seems disingenuous to me.
And I suspect Sanderson was pretty high on the list of choices to finish the series, Joe Abercrombie's feelings on the matter aside.
I asked Joe Abercrombie if he would have considered doing it and he laughed and said something along the lines of, "God, No!" (of course, I asked him via e-mail, I don't personally know the man).