Moe Ronalds
First Post
Simplicity said:There's two ghoul stereotypes that I can think of:
the ravenous ghoul and the blue blooded ghoul.
The blue blooded ghoul can be much more sinister. These
guys are essentially nobility that feast upon the homeless,
the unwanted, or criminals. Unlike the ravenous ghoul, these
guys are much more likely to use silverware on their meals
and/or prepare the meals intricately. It is not unusual for
paralyzed victims to sit at the table as dinner is served in
multiple courses. Sometimes this ghoulishness
comes in the form of a family curse, and sometimes new ghouls
are created by the blue bloods inviting guests over for dinner.
These creatures are generally well-fed, and do not succumb to
the irrational behavior of their ravenous cousins, but they do require
a steady supply of food to 'live'.
Though not officially a ghoul, Hannibal Lecter is a good example of this
stereotype. He even does the paralyzing trick at one point...
There was a Tales from the Crypt episode at one point
about this sort of ghoul as well. They formed an interesting (but not
very intelligently named) organization for taking street people in and
finding them new homes: the Grateful Homeless, Outcasts, and Unwanteds
Layaway Society.
Dag nabbit. Now I really really *really* wanna run a low-magic victorian campaign with a line of ghoul nobles. Bad simplicity! Bad bad! No cookie!