Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
The Great Conjunction (RPG DESIGN CONTEST)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jack7" data-source="post: 4624016" data-attributes="member: 54707"><p>It's not my contest EP, so I'm not establishing any rules of engagement. But I can give you a piece of advice regarding writing. Recently I wrote a paper for the Naval Postgraduate School detailing an idea about intelligence networks. I had only five pages, single spaced, 12 point type to encapsulate my ideas.</p><p></p><p>The paper was based upon a much longer and more formal theory paper on the same subject matter (but with a different emphasis, the emphasis of this paper was on giving suggestions to the next administration on Homeland Security matters through the CHDS, the emphasis of the original paper was on the general development of small-scale, functional private intelligence networks) but this paper required wholesale editing of my original ideas.</p><p></p><p>The point being that I could not submit my original paper, I had to change the emphasis, and had very limited space for presentation. Therefore I severely excised and redacted my theory paper, extracted the relevant and necessary parts, collated the information needed, and therefore arranged a paper which fit the requirements of the assignment. My original theory paper remains available for public publication in another format, and with a different emphasis, when I wish to do so (it is in private circulation now).</p><p></p><p>My advice, as a writer, is to meet the necessary parameters and rules of the contest, but write what you want. Develop the body of your work as you wish and then pare and edit as necessary to meet actual guidelines and restrictions, if you want to enter the contest as it is described. You will always have your more well developed opus for publication elsewhere with another party at another time.</p><p></p><p>Or you could do as I am doing. I will not be competing in the contest directly. That is my work will be available for voluntary review but I will not compete because I intend to exceed restrictions and more importantly because I intend to seek publication of my work later on, and many of the ideas I present will be proprietary and I wish to secure them.</p><p></p><p>So if you're using the contest as stimulus to develop a significant and involved work I'd suggest it doesn't much matter, but you can't expect to exceed guidelines and win the contest. You will be disqualified for exceeding guidelines.</p><p></p><p>If however you do want to compete and win the contest then the best thing is to develop the work you really want to write, then edit that down to produce a sub-work or smaller version of your real project that will meet guidelines. You'll always have your larger and more involved work to do with as you wish at another time.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jack7, post: 4624016, member: 54707"] It's not my contest EP, so I'm not establishing any rules of engagement. But I can give you a piece of advice regarding writing. Recently I wrote a paper for the Naval Postgraduate School detailing an idea about intelligence networks. I had only five pages, single spaced, 12 point type to encapsulate my ideas. The paper was based upon a much longer and more formal theory paper on the same subject matter (but with a different emphasis, the emphasis of this paper was on giving suggestions to the next administration on Homeland Security matters through the CHDS, the emphasis of the original paper was on the general development of small-scale, functional private intelligence networks) but this paper required wholesale editing of my original ideas. The point being that I could not submit my original paper, I had to change the emphasis, and had very limited space for presentation. Therefore I severely excised and redacted my theory paper, extracted the relevant and necessary parts, collated the information needed, and therefore arranged a paper which fit the requirements of the assignment. My original theory paper remains available for public publication in another format, and with a different emphasis, when I wish to do so (it is in private circulation now). My advice, as a writer, is to meet the necessary parameters and rules of the contest, but write what you want. Develop the body of your work as you wish and then pare and edit as necessary to meet actual guidelines and restrictions, if you want to enter the contest as it is described. You will always have your more well developed opus for publication elsewhere with another party at another time. Or you could do as I am doing. I will not be competing in the contest directly. That is my work will be available for voluntary review but I will not compete because I intend to exceed restrictions and more importantly because I intend to seek publication of my work later on, and many of the ideas I present will be proprietary and I wish to secure them. So if you're using the contest as stimulus to develop a significant and involved work I'd suggest it doesn't much matter, but you can't expect to exceed guidelines and win the contest. You will be disqualified for exceeding guidelines. If however you do want to compete and win the contest then the best thing is to develop the work you really want to write, then edit that down to produce a sub-work or smaller version of your real project that will meet guidelines. You'll always have your larger and more involved work to do with as you wish at another time. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
The Great Conjunction (RPG DESIGN CONTEST)
Top