The Hive is (realy) Dead! Long Live the Hive Mind!

Status
Not open for further replies.
hafrogman said:
Why would your cat have to die for knowle. . . nevermind. I probably don't want to know. :uhoh: The things I miss from not watching Tom Selleck more often . . .

As I said, I didn't have much curiousity, thus it wasn't invoked, which would've killed the cat...

Beware the hypnotic Selleck 'Stache....
 

log in or register to remove this ad

The_One_Warlock said:
Except it wasn't a favor to me, it was a preference of yours, since I still think to be sanitary, you need to boil the raw vegan. Thus, since I neither wanted nor needed any fixing of my statement, the end purpose is not to fix it for me, but merely to rebut my statement with a subjective reality of your own which will eventually lead to madness and despair (and possibly E. Coli poisoning), thus, you fixed it for you, which at the time, you would've been me, which should've been acronymized to FIFM.
Ah, but in this case, given that for you and I, unless you are one of those weird relativists, time has passed for all observers on this planet at a more or less constant pace, resulting in a change of perspective for yesterday evening from being a potential future to being past events, now immutable unless you have a time machine in your back pocket, which I don't believe you do. Thus, I, using my knowledge of what actually occured last night, fixed your statement for you, changing it, not for my own preference, but rather to affect an alteration towards the state of reality that actually occured, making your statemtent more correct from the new temporal point shard by you and I, providing your predictive statement with a measure of legitimacy, which is thereby shared with you, providing an intangible benefit to you, as the maker of the statement, thus my fixing of the statement was a favor done to you, by me, for your own improvement, thus for you, have I fixed it.
 

hafrogman said:
Ah, but in this case, given that for you and I, unless you are one of those weird relativists, time has passed for all observers on this planet at a more or less constant pace, resulting in a change of perspective for yesterday evening from being a potential future to being past events, now immutable unless you have a time machine in your back pocket, which I don't believe you do. Thus, I, using my knowledge of what actually occured last night, fixed your statement for you, changing it, not for my own preference, but rather to affect an alteration towards the state of reality that actually occured, making your statemtent more correct from the new temporal point shard by you and I, providing your predictive statement with a measure of legitimacy, which is thereby shared with you, providing an intangible benefit to you, as the maker of the statement, thus my fixing of the statement was a favor done to you, by me, for your own improvement, thus for you, have I fixed it.

However, my statement, being a description of an event with a probablilty greater than null, not having been observed by the statement maker produces a potential reality which we shall identify as the Quantum Date, with both the Boiled and Non-Boiled vegan as potential outcomes, and since you are, in fact, a participating variable in the particle interaction, your reported specific outcome is not, in fact, an observance of the system to determine which has actually happened, but rather a limited expostition by a thinking particle of non-quantum perception relating one of the two possible states. As such, we the the observer, still have a statement of probablility extent until such a time as the experiment is revealed, thus it is impossible for you to fix my statement for me, being you at the time, because you have not truly observed the reality, merely one quanta, so you must be fixing it for you, not being me, but stated as me, being you, to properly achieve connection between your limited perception with the statements made outside the bounds of the experiement. As such, the statement can't be fixed for me until the experiement is properly observed, which based on the expected time with would take to parboil a whole vegan, means I won't be checking until at least tomorrow to see if you have in fact fixed it for me, or you.
 

The_One_Warlock said:
However, my statement, being a description of an event with a probablilty greater than null, not having been observed by the statement maker produces a potential reality which we shall identify as the Quantum Date, with both the Boiled and Non-Boiled vegan as potential outcomes, and since you are, in fact, a participating variable in the particle interaction, your reported specific outcome is not, in fact, an observance of the system to determine which has actually happened, but rather a limited expostition by a thinking particle of non-quantum perception relating one of the two possible states. As such, we the the observer, still have a statement of probablility extent until such a time as the experiment is revealed, thus it is impossible for you to fix my statement for me, being you at the time, because you have not truly observed the reality, merely one quanta, so you must be fixing it for you, not being me, but stated as me, being you, to properly achieve connection between your limited perception with the statements made outside the bounds of the experiement. As such, the statement can't be fixed for me until the experiement is properly observed, which based on the expected time with would take to parboil a whole vegan, means I won't be checking until at least tomorrow to see if you have in fact fixed it for me, or you.
So. . . what you're telling me, is that I'm dating Schroedinger's Catherine.
 

hafrogman said:
So. . . what you're telling me, is that I'm dating Schroedinger's Catherine.

(Shakes Magic 8 Ball)

"Signs point to OMGWTFBBQ"

Hmmm, I think it's been infected by the "most annoying acronyms on the net" thread...
 

The_One_Warlock said:
Hmmm, I think it's been infected by the "most annoying acronyms on the net" thread...
Really? Let me see that thing.

*shakes the 8-ball*

*shakes it*

*shakes it*
*shakes it*

*shakes it like a polaroid picture*

"R0FLC0PT3RZ"

Damn, it's worse than we thought. Leet! The only thing is to take it out back and shoot it.
 

hafrogman said:
Really? Let me see that thing.

*shakes the 8-ball*

*shakes it*

*shakes it*
*shakes it*

*shakes it like a polaroid picture*

"R0FLC0PT3RZ"

Damn, it's worse than we thought. Leet! The only thing is to take it out back and shoot it.

No need, we just need to intimidate it...

(Takes out Magic Hate Ball and Shakes it at the Magic 8 Ball)

"Signs points to 'Yes sir, may I have another?'"

I'm not sure if that's better....
 




Status
Not open for further replies.
Remove ads

Top