Hmmm, personality quiz time: When you refer to Target, in your mind, do you call itAurora said:Well, I am gonna go get dressed and I think Kylee and I are gonna go to Target.
hafrogman said:Hmmm, personality quiz time: When you refer to Target, in your mind, do you call it
Tar-get, accepting of the low prices and convenience of the department store?
or, do you call it
Tar-jay, pretending you're french and making the store seem classier than it really is?
Personally, I've been calling it Tar-jay for so long that I can't seem to stop.![]()
I reserve that name for K-mart. . . pre-bankruptcy. Although there's still a few around, which I've never quite understood.The_One_Warlock said:Or do you just call it "Not Walmart"?
Yeah, and then they go and buy Sears.hafrogman said:I reserve that name for K-mart. . . pre-bankruptcy. Although there's still a few around, which I've never quite understood.
Aurora said:.....what with all the surrendering involved and that.
Just kidding....mostly.![]()
Um. . . actually it's pretty sound tactical thinking. It just got out-maneuvered by BETTER tactical thinking.The_One_Warlock said:The Maginot Line...Because building a wall across only PART of an invader's path of approach seems like a fine plan...
hafrogman said:Um. . . actually it's pretty sound tactical thinking. It just got out-maneuvered by BETTER tactical thinking.
But in general, limiting your enemies' approach vectors is a good idea.
See: points of entry, building.
Then watch Burn Notice.![]()